The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the fee of the liquidator has to be paid within 90 days from the liquidation commencement date as provided under Regulation 21A of the Liquidation Regulations if the secured creditor opts to realise its security interest under section 52 of the code.
Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd., the appellant challenged an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority by which the AA directed the appellant to pay fees of the Liquidator. The corporate debtor was admitted into insolvency on an application filed by Narendra Solvex Private Limited. When no resolution plan was approved, the corporate debtor was ordered to be liquidated. Dispute arose pertaining to fees of the liquidator. The bank alleged that the fees calculated by the liquidator is exorbitant and unsupported by law. Thereafter, the liquidator filed an IA seeking payment of its fees.
Boost Your Business with SME IPO Funding Strategies – Enroll Now
It was the case of the appellant that the Respondent had not played any role in realising the asset and the Appellant had itself set the recovery machinery in motion under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and recovered its amount by auction of the secured asset and that Respondent / Liquidator is illegally demanding a fee contrary to the provisions of law which has not accrued in the first place.
It was submitted that the term ‘amount realised’ means an amount that is being realised from the sale of an asset where the asset changes. Secondly, in cases where the funds are readily available for distribution, the Liquidator is entitled to a fee only on distribution.
It was further contended that the Respondent is only eligible for entitlement of fee under Regulation 4 Sub-Regulation 2(b), only when the Liquidator has actually realised or distributed any amount. However, in the present case, there has neither been any distribution nor any realisation of amounts by the Respondent, in so far as the secured asset of the Appellant is concerned.
Boost Your Business with SME IPO Funding Strategies – Enroll Now
On the other hand, it is the case of the respondent that the Appellant did not comply with Regulation 21-A of the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016, within the 90 days of the liquidation commencement date. The Appellant was required to pay the following costs in order to comply with Regulation 21-A(2) of the Liquidation Process Regulations .
Itwas further argued that the Respondent / Liquidator, on 15.05.2023, requested the Appellant to remit the pending CIRP /liquidation cost, including the fee of the Liquidator, which is a condition precedent as mandated under Regulation 21-A(2) of the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016.
The tribunal observed that Regulation 21-A of the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016,mandates Secured Creditors to inform the Liquidator of their decision to realise their security interest and to pay their share of the liquidation costs within 90 days. It was agreed by the Appellant that the liquidation cost will be shared as per Regulation 21-A but was raising clarifications regarding its calculations and which was clarified also by the liquidator again and again and this exchange was going on for quite some time.
Boost Your Business with SME IPO Funding Strategies – Enroll Now
The tribunal viewed that the Secured Creditor is mandatorily obligated to pay its share as per Section 53(1)(a) and 53(1)(b)(i)of the Code which provides for distribution of assets from the sale of liquidation assets in the order of priority. (waterfall mechanism).
The bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Barun Mitra( Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member) held that with respect to the Secured Financial Creditor, Regulation 21-A(2)(a) is applicable. The Liquidator’s fee is also prescribed under Regulation 4. The appellant’s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal.
Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the JudgmentSupport our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates
