Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]

CESTAT rules Transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR, set back to Crompton Greaves
Crompton-Greaves-CESTAT-rules-Transformers-constitute-CESTAT-CCR-TAXSCAN

In a setback to Crompton Greaves Ltd, the Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that the transformers constitute ‘inputs’ in terms of rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules (CCR), 2004. M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd, the appellant in these two appeals, is a manufacturer of ‘transformers’, which are…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹1199 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

taxscan-loader