Shreya Khandkar
![NCLAT Dismisses Share Transfer Appeal as Time-Barred, Rules Section 14 Benefit Not Applicable after Failed Civil Suit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/07/500x300_2117548-nclat-dismisses-share-transfer-appeal-time-barred-rules.webp "NCLAT Dismisses Share Transfer Appeal as Time-Barred, Rules Section 14 Benefit Not Applicable after Failed Civil Suit [Read Order]")
NCLAT Dismisses Share Transfer Appeal as Time-Barred, Rules Section 14 Benefit Not Applicable after Failed Civil Suit [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the shareholder’s appeal on wrongful transfer of 500 shares as barred...
![No Addition Permissible in Unabated AY Without Incriminating Material Found During Search: ITAT Deletes Rs. 7.25 Crore Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/07/250x150_2117591-itat-deletes-rs-725-crore-addition-taxscan.jfif "No Addition Permissible in Unabated AY Without Incriminating Material Found During Search: ITAT Deletes Rs. 7.25 Crore Addition [Read Order]")
![Withdrawal of SARFAESI Notice Does Not Invalidate Recovery Certificate: NCLAT Allows SBIs Insolvency Petitions Against Guarantors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/06/250x150_2117325-withdrawal-sarfaesi-notice-does-not-invalidate-recovery-certificate-taxscan.jfif "Withdrawal of SARFAESI Notice Does Not Invalidate Recovery Certificate: NCLAT Allows SBIs Insolvency Petitions Against Guarantors [Read Order]")
![Extended Limitation Not Invocable for Audit & Income Tax Data-Based Demand: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/06/250x150_2117250-extended-limitation-not-invocable-for-audit-income-tax-data-based-demand-cestat-quashes-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Extended Limitation Not Invocable for Audit & Income Tax Data-Based Demand: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Double Taxation Relief under New Income Tax: Treaty Provisions, Bilateral Agreements, and Procedural Changes [Old vs New Income Tax Series - Article 8]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/06/250x150_2117242-old-vs-new-income-tax-comparison-taxscan.webp "Double Taxation Relief under New Income Tax: Treaty Provisions, Bilateral Agreements, and Procedural Changes [Old vs New Income Tax Series - Article 8]")
Service Tax Demand upheld for Willful Suppression and Non-Filing of Returns: CESTAT Confirms ₹1.30 Lakh on Works Contract and Erection Services [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld a ₹1.30 lakh service tax demand for FY 2016-17, invoking extended limitation under Section 73(1) due to...
![Service Tax Demand upheld for Willful Suppression and Non-Filing of Returns: CESTAT Confirms ₹1.30 Lakh on Works Contract and Erection Services [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/500x300_2116944-service-tax-demand-upheld-willful-suppression-non-filing-returns-cestat-confirms-works-contract-erection-services-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand upheld for Willful Suppression and Non-Filing of Returns: CESTAT Confirms ₹1.30 Lakh on Works Contract and Erection Services [Read Order]")
Works Contract Service Tax Demand of Rs. 2.30L: CESTAT Orders Fresh Assessment of Abatement and Reverse Charge Benefits [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) remanded a ₹2.30 lakh service tax demand for Works Contract Service for FY 2014-15 and directed consideration of...
![Works Contract Service Tax Demand of Rs. 2.30L: CESTAT Orders Fresh Assessment of Abatement and Reverse Charge Benefits [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/03/500x300_2116874-works-contract-service-tax-demand-cestat-orders-fresh-assessment-abatement-reverse-charge-benefits-taxscan.webp "Works Contract Service Tax Demand of Rs. 2.30L: CESTAT Orders Fresh Assessment of Abatement and Reverse Charge Benefits [Read Order]")
Voluntary Service Tax Payment u/s 73(3) Constitutes Final Settlement, Not Mere Deposit: CESTAT Dismisses Refund Appeal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that voluntary payment of service tax under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 amounts to a final...
![Voluntary Service Tax Payment u/s 73(3) Constitutes Final Settlement, Not Mere Deposit: CESTAT Dismisses Refund Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/02/500x300_2116776-voluntary-service-tax-payment-733-constitutes-final-settlement-not-mere-deposit-cestat-dismisses-refund-appeal-taxscan.webp "Voluntary Service Tax Payment u/s 73(3) Constitutes Final Settlement, Not Mere Deposit: CESTAT Dismisses Refund Appeal [Read Order]")
Knowledge Centre Services Qualify as Management Consultancy, Not Legal Services: CESTAT Holds Classification Cannot Be Challenged at Refund Stage [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Knowledge Centre Services of OSC Export Services Pvt. Ltd. were classified as Management or Business...
![Knowledge Centre Services Qualify as Management Consultancy, Not Legal Services: CESTAT Holds Classification Cannot Be Challenged at Refund Stage [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/02/500x300_2116761-knowledge-centre-services-qualify-as-management-consultancy-not-legal-services-cestat-holds-classification-cannot-be-challenged-at-refund-stage.webp "Knowledge Centre Services Qualify as Management Consultancy, Not Legal Services: CESTAT Holds Classification Cannot Be Challenged at Refund Stage [Read Order]")
Works Contract Cannot Be Taxed as Residential Complex Construction Service: CESTAT Sets Aside Rs 80 Lakh Service Tax Demand, upholds Penalty for Non-Registration
The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) held that composite works contracts cannot be taxed under Constructionof Residential Complex Services and such...
No CENVAT Reversal Required on Sale of Empty Packaging Material: CESTAT Holds Rule 6 Inapplicable to Non-Manufactured Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules applies only when both exempted and dutiable goods were...
![No CENVAT Reversal Required on Sale of Empty Packaging Material: CESTAT Holds Rule 6 Inapplicable to Non-Manufactured Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/500x300_2116497-cestat-holds-rule-6-inapplicable-to-non-manufactured-goods-taxscan.jfif "No CENVAT Reversal Required on Sale of Empty Packaging Material: CESTAT Holds Rule 6 Inapplicable to Non-Manufactured Goods [Read Order]")