Sufficient evidence to establish that brand name belonged to third person: CESTAT upholds excise duty demand [Read Order]

CESTAT upholds the excise duty demand as there was sufficient evidence to establish that the brand name belonged to third person
Sufficient evidence - CESTAT - excise duty demand - excise duty - evidence - taxscan

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the excise duty demand as there was sufficient evidence to establish that the brand name belonged to third person. The Appellant – M/s Sri Sai Krishna Health Care Products (SSKHCP) is engaged in manufacture of mosquito coils falling under Chapter Sub-heading…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹1199 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

taxscan-loader