![Alleged Bogus Sales and Commission Addition u/s 68 & 69C: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Deletion after Assessing Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/500x300_2087395-alleged-bogus-sales-commission-addition-itat-cita-evidence-taxscan.webp "Alleged Bogus Sales and Commission Addition u/s 68 & 69C: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Deletion after Assessing Evidence [Read Order]")
Alleged Bogus Sales and Commission Addition u/s 68 & 69C: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Deletion after Assessing Evidence [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the deletion of alleged bogus sales and commission additions under section 68 and...
![ITAT Deletes ₹1 Crore Addition, Rules Refunded Advances Cant Be Taxed as Income [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/250x150_2042898-itat-itat-kolkata-refunded-advance-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes ₹1 Crore Addition, Rules Refunded Advances Cant Be Taxed as Income [Read Order]")
![Reopening u/s 147 Must Be Based on Specific and Clear Grounds, Not Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes ₹68L Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Reopening-under-section-147-TAXSCAN.jpg "Reopening u/s 147 Must Be Based on Specific and Clear Grounds, Not Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes ₹68L Addition [Read Order]")
![Recall Plea Unjustified as Reassessment was already Quashed: ITAT Rejects Revenue’s Miscellaneous Application [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-ITAT-rejects-revenues-application-TAXSCAN.jpg "Recall Plea Unjustified as Reassessment was already Quashed: ITAT Rejects Revenue’s Miscellaneous Application [Read Order]")
![ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Hearing Despite Assessee Fails to Respond to Notices Four Times, w/o any Reasons [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-fresh-hearing.webp "ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Hearing Despite Assessee Fails to Respond to Notices Four Times, w/o any Reasons [Read Order]")
No Income Tax Addition can be made Solely Based on Hypothecated Stock Disclosure to Bank: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that income additions cannot be made solely based on the difference between stock disclosed to a bank and that recorded in audited...
![No Income Tax Addition can be made Solely Based on Hypothecated Stock Disclosure to Bank: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/BANK-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Income Tax Addition can be made Solely Based on Hypothecated Stock Disclosure to Bank: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessment Proceedings u/s 151A and SCN Passed without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes NFAC’s orders [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the orders passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre’s orders as the latter observed that the assessment proceedings...
![Assessment Proceedings u/s 151A and SCN Passed without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes NFAC’s orders [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-ITAT-quashes-NFAC-orders-Section-151A-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Assessment Proceedings u/s 151A and SCN Passed without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes NFAC’s orders [Read Order]")
CIT(A) failed to consider Factual Mistake Committed by CPC: ITAT Directs AO to Delete Adjustment of Rs. 3.09 Crore [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the assessing officer to delete the adjustment of Rs. 3.09 crores as the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] failed to...
![CIT(A) failed to consider Factual Mistake Committed by CPC: ITAT Directs AO to Delete Adjustment of Rs. 3.09 Crore [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ruling-Income-Tax-appeal-CPC-mistake-taxscan-.jpg "CIT(A) failed to consider Factual Mistake Committed by CPC: ITAT Directs AO to Delete Adjustment of Rs. 3.09 Crore [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹5.11 Crore Forex Loss on ECB Settlement: ITAT Restores Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the issue of ₹5.11 crore forex fluctuation loss on the settlement of External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) to the Assessing Officer...
![Disallowance of ₹5.11 Crore Forex Loss on ECB Settlement: ITAT Restores Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Disallowance-of-Forex-Loss-TAXSCAN.jpg "Disallowance of ₹5.11 Crore Forex Loss on ECB Settlement: ITAT Restores Matter to AO [Read Order]")
TPO’s Rejection of CUP Analysis Despite DRP Directions: ITAT Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustment [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the transfer pricing adjustment after Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)’s rejection of CUP analysis despite Dispute Resolution Panel...
![TPO’s Rejection of CUP Analysis Despite DRP Directions: ITAT Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-TPO-Transfer-pricing-officer-Income-tax-news-TAXSCAN.jpg "TPO’s Rejection of CUP Analysis Despite DRP Directions: ITAT Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustment [Read Order]")
![Incorrect Deduction in Leave Encashment Disallowance: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Incorrect-Deduction-Leave-Encashment-Disallowance-ITAT-ITAT-Remands-Matter-Remands-Matter-taxscan.jpg "Incorrect Deduction in Leave Encashment Disallowance: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")
ITAT Quashes Reopening based on Investigation Wing’s Information without Independent Verification, Holds Invalid [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling that reassessments based purely on external...
![ITAT Quashes Reopening based on Investigation Wing’s Information without Independent Verification, Holds Invalid [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/itat-3.jpg "ITAT Quashes Reopening based on Investigation Wing’s Information without Independent Verification, Holds Invalid [Read Order]")