![Yamaha’s Rebate Claim u/r 18 for NCCD on Exported Goods Must be Re-Examined: Bombay HC Orders Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/28/500x300_2108462-yamaha-nccd-exported-goods-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp "Yamaha’s Rebate Claim u/r 18 for NCCD on Exported Goods Must be Re-Examined: Bombay HC Orders Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
Yamaha’s Rebate Claim u/r 18 for NCCD on Exported Goods Must be Re-Examined: Bombay HC Orders Fresh Consideration [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court held that the rejection of the assessee’s rebate claim under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was unsustainable as...
![CENVAT Credit cannot be Denied if Service Invoice was Addressed to Architect Entrusted by Construction Company [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/26/250x150_2108151-cenvat-credit-architect-constrution-company-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Credit cannot be Denied if Service Invoice was Addressed to Architect Entrusted by Construction Company [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes ₹45 Lakh Penalty Under Rule 26 for Inapplicability Without Confiscation of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/250x150_2107769-cestat-rule-26-inapplicability-confiscation-goods-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Quashes ₹45 Lakh Penalty Under Rule 26 for Inapplicability Without Confiscation of Goods [Read Order]")
![Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/250x150_2107068-refund-recovery-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Cost-Sharing Among Group Entities for Events Outside India Does Not Amount to Taxable Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/250x150_2106930-cestat-taxscan.webp "Cost-Sharing Among Group Entities for Events Outside India Does Not Amount to Taxable Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Interest Not Payable from 2008 Deposit: CESTAT Holds Sugar Manufacturer Not Entitled to Interest on Investigative Deposit [Read Order]
CESTAT denies interest from 2008 deposit, allowing Revenue’s appeal The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the Revenue’s...
![Interest Not Payable from 2008 Deposit: CESTAT Holds Sugar Manufacturer Not Entitled to Interest on Investigative Deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106836-fa80a3f0-beb7-4f16-b45e-10733eba48aa.webp "Interest Not Payable from 2008 Deposit: CESTAT Holds Sugar Manufacturer Not Entitled to Interest on Investigative Deposit [Read Order]")
CESTAT Rules CENVAT Credit Refund Cannot Be Denied Due to Procedural Lapse of Filing Monthly Claims Instead of Quarterly [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the refund of unutilized CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely on the procedural ground that ...
![CESTAT Rules CENVAT Credit Refund Cannot Be Denied Due to Procedural Lapse of Filing Monthly Claims Instead of Quarterly [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/500x300_2107036-cestat-cenvat-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules CENVAT Credit Refund Cannot Be Denied Due to Procedural Lapse of Filing Monthly Claims Instead of Quarterly [Read Order]")
CENVAT Reversal to be Computed Only on Common Input Services, Not Total Credit: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]
The New Delhi Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT) Bench has set aside the demand of CENVAT credit reversal, holding that the Department had...
![CENVAT Reversal to be Computed Only on Common Input Services, Not Total Credit: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104933-cenvat-cestat-central-excise-act-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Reversal to be Computed Only on Common Input Services, Not Total Credit: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
CENVAT Credit Claim of Rs. 9.34 Crores Rejected for ST-3 Mismatch and Missing Documents: Delhi HC Allows AAI to File Appeal and Submit Additional Evidence [Read Order]
The High Court of Delhi,allowed AAI to file an appeal and submit additional documents after its claim for CENVAT credit of Rs. 9.34 crores was rejected due to a mismatch in ST-3 returns and...
![CENVAT Credit Claim of Rs. 9.34 Crores Rejected for ST-3 Mismatch and Missing Documents: Delhi HC Allows AAI to File Appeal and Submit Additional Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/08/500x300_2094882-cenvat-credit-printing-machine-cylinders-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Credit Claim of Rs. 9.34 Crores Rejected for ST-3 Mismatch and Missing Documents: Delhi HC Allows AAI to File Appeal and Submit Additional Evidence [Read Order]")
![Loan Prepayment Charges Not Admissible for CENVAT Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093052-site-image-2.webp "Loan Prepayment Charges Not Admissible for CENVAT Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CENVAT Credit availed on input service which are used for output service cannot be denied: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/02/500x300_2083336-cenvat-credit-input-service-cestat-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Credit availed on input service which are used for output service cannot be denied: CESTAT [Read Order]")