Read all Latest Updates on and about CESTAT Delhi

Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Home
»
CESTAT Delhi

Grant of Mining Rights is Exercise of Sovereign Function, Covered Under Negative List: CESTAT [Read Order]

In a recent ruling, the Principal Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that grant of mining rights by...

Royalty & Dead Rent Collected for Grant of Mining Leases Not Taxable as ‘Renting Of Immovable...

Service Tax Exemption for Non-Commercial Govt Buildings: CESTAT Remands Matter for Fresh...

Chilly Seeds for Sowing Classified Under CTH 1209, Not CTH 0904: CESTAT Rules Chemical-Treated Seeds...

Export Confiscation Order of Rs. 34 Cr set aside on Procedural Grounds: CESTAT Emphasizes Mandatory...

CESTAT Upholds Rs 19.5 Lakh Customs Penalty: Viscose Fabric Declared but Polyester Imported, Supplier Error Claim Rejected [Read Order]

The Principal Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi, upheld a ₹19.53 lakh penalty for mis-declaration of imported fabric. The goods declared as...

Dietary Supplements Not Eligible For Area-Based Excise Exemption Meant For Pharmaceuticals: CESTAT [Read Order]

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that dietary food supplements cannot be treated as pharmaceutical products and are not eligible for the...

Relief for Bridgestone India: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹96 Lakh Excise Demand for Alleged Excess CENVAT Credit [Read Order]

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi, has set aside a demand of central excise duty amounting to over ₹96 lakh, finding the extended...

CESTAT Sets Aside Section 114AA Penalty Due to Failure in Establishing Proof of Intentional Use of Manipulated Scrip [Read Order]

The New Delhi Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be sustained in the absence...

Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules already Declared Unconstitutional by Gujarat HC: CESTAT sets aside ₹14.14cr Demand [Read Order]

The New Delhi Principal Bench of the Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has set aside a central excise duty demand raised under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, ...

Customs Cannot Reject Declared Value of LED TVs Based on Third-Party Documents Without Independent Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Customs authorities cannot reject the declared transaction value of imported LED TVs based solely...

Break-up of Charges in Builder Agreement Supports Non-Taxability of Parking Fees: CESTAT relief to Omaxe Buildhome [Read Order]

The Delhi Principal Bench of the CESTAT has ruled in favour of Omaxe Buildhome Limited, holding that car parking charges collected during July 2010 to June 2012 were not taxable as part of ...