Time Spent Before Refund Authority to Be Excluded for Limitation: CESTAT Remands Custom Appeal on Post-Clearance FTA Exemption Claim
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that administrative delays and time spent pursuing a...
![CESTAT cannot be Compelled to Restore Customs Appeal After Decades of Delay and Repeated Defaults in Pre-Deposit: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/250x150_2112977-cestat-restore-customs-appeal-decades-delay-repeated-defaults-pre-deposit-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "CESTAT cannot be Compelled to Restore Customs Appeal After Decades of Delay and Repeated Defaults in Pre-Deposit: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Rules Reliance’s Indonesian Steam Coal Imports Not Overvalued, Supreme Court to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/250x150_2104835-cestat-cestat-rules-coal-imports-reliances-indonesian-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Reliance’s Indonesian Steam Coal Imports Not Overvalued, Supreme Court to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/250x150_2101584-delhi-hc-holds-dri-officers-proper-authorities-under-section-28-restores-microsoft-india-customs-appeals-for-merit-hearing-txn.webp "Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]")
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/250x150_2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]")
Dismissal of Customs Appeal on Limitation Set Aside: Madras HC Allows Reconsideration of Duty Drawback Claim Upon Full Deposit [Read Order]
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside the dismissal of the firm’s customs appeal on the grounds of limitation and remanded the matter back to the customs authorities for...
![Dismissal of Customs Appeal on Limitation Set Aside: Madras HC Allows Reconsideration of Duty Drawback Claim Upon Full Deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2059161-dismissal-of-customs-appeal-on-limitation-customs-appeal-customs-appeal-on-limitation-taxscan.webp "Dismissal of Customs Appeal on Limitation Set Aside: Madras HC Allows Reconsideration of Duty Drawback Claim Upon Full Deposit [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC directs CESTAT to decide Customs Appeal on Merit, Sets Aside Remand Orders [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Delhi-High-Court-CESTAT-delhi-customs-appeal-remand-orders-taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC directs CESTAT to decide Customs Appeal on Merit, Sets Aside Remand Orders [Read Order]")
CESTAT Competent to Reject Customs Appeal for Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit u/s 129E: Delhi HC [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court has held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) is competent to reject Customs Appeals for non-compliance with the Pre-deposit...
![CESTAT Competent to Reject Customs Appeal for Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit u/s 129E: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CESTAT-Customs-Appeal-Delhi-HC-CESTAT-Competent-to-Reject-Customs-Appeal-for-Non-Compliance-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Competent to Reject Customs Appeal for Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit u/s 129E: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Kerala HC directs Conditional Release of Seized Gold and Gold Items in-spite of Customs Appeals by Revenue [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court has ruled in favour of the assessees, in a customs case where the gold seized were not released despite favorable ruling in the order-in-original. The Single Bench of Kerala...
444 Days Delay In Filing Customs Appeal: Dismisses Appeal in Absence of Satisfactory Reason for Delay [Read Order]
The Supreme Court in a recent case dismissed the appeal filed for condoning a delay of 444 days for filing a Customs Appeal. The two-judge bench found that in the absence of any satisfactory reason...
