887g Gold in Paste Form Recovered from Passenger's Body: Delhi HC Permits Appeal Against Absolute Confiscation Order [Read Order]
The High Court of Delhi has permitted the petitioner to challenge it through the statutory appeal mechanism while disposing of a writ petition...
![Gold of Turkish Nationals Came for Medical Treatment Seized: Delhi HC orders Re-export, Directs Warehouse Charges at Detention-Date Rates [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/250x150_2111252-gold-of-turkish-nationals-came-medical-treatment-seized-taxscan.webp "Gold of Turkish Nationals Came for Medical Treatment Seized: Delhi HC orders Re-export, Directs Warehouse Charges at Detention-Date Rates [Read Order]")
![Specific Averments Sufficient to Attract Vicarious Liability of Directors under NI Act: Delhi HC Refuses to Quash Cheque Dishonour in FIITJEE Loan Dispute [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111638-specific-averments-sufficient-attract-vicarious-liability-directors-ni-act-delhi-hc-refuses-quash-cheque-dishonour-fiitjee-loan-dispute-taxscan.webp "Specific Averments Sufficient to Attract Vicarious Liability of Directors under NI Act: Delhi HC Refuses to Quash Cheque Dishonour in FIITJEE Loan Dispute [Read Order]")
![‘No Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi HC Rejects Revenues Challenge in Tupperware India Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111624-delhi-hc-tupperware-india-substantial-question-revenue-challenge-transfer-pricing-case-taxscan.webp "‘No Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi HC Rejects Revenues Challenge in Tupperware India Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order]")
![Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111613-doctrine-judicial-comity-bars-civil-court-entertaining-forgery-case-pending-before-nclt-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "Doctrine of Judicial Comity Bars Civil Court from Entertaining Forgery Case Pending Before NCLT: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
License Fee for Goodwill is Revenue Expenditure, Not Prohibited by Law: Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–21, challenging the allowance of licence fees paid by M/s Remfry & Sagar for the use of ...
![License Fee for Goodwill is Revenue Expenditure, Not Prohibited by Law: Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Judgment]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111607-license-fee-for-goodwill-revenue-expenditure-delhi-hc-taxscan.jfif "License Fee for Goodwill is Revenue Expenditure, Not Prohibited by Law: Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Judgment]")
58g Gold Chain Seized from Saudi Passenger, No SCN issued: Delhi HC Orders Fresh Personal Hearing [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that the alleged waiver of a Show Cause Notice (SCN) in a 58 gram gold seizure matter was not legally valid, directing the Customs Department to grant a fresh personal...
![58g Gold Chain Seized from Saudi Passenger, No SCN issued: Delhi HC Orders Fresh Personal Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111072-gold-chain-seized-no-scn-issued-delhi-hc-taxscan.jfif "58g Gold Chain Seized from Saudi Passenger, No SCN issued: Delhi HC Orders Fresh Personal Hearing [Read Order]")
CESTAT Erred in Ignoring Existing Deposits: Delhi HC Rules Deposits already with Customs Bar Dismissal of Appeals
The Delhi High Court has held that appeals cannot be dismissed for non-payment of pre-deposit when significant sums already lie with the Customs Department, ruling that such existing deposits...
Fraudulent GST ITC Matter Requires Factual Adjudication: Delhi HC Declines Writ, Relegates Matter to Appeal u/s 107 CGST Act [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has declined to entertain a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging a GST demand order, holding that fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) cases require factual...
![Fraudulent GST ITC Matter Requires Factual Adjudication: Delhi HC Declines Writ, Relegates Matter to Appeal u/s 107 CGST Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111000-fraudulent-gst-itc-requires-factual-adjudication-delhi-hc-declines-writ-relegates-matter-appeal-cgst-act-taxscan.webp "Fraudulent GST ITC Matter Requires Factual Adjudication: Delhi HC Declines Writ, Relegates Matter to Appeal u/s 107 CGST Act [Read Order]")
GST SCN Properly Uploaded, No Reply Filed: Delhi HC Declines Interference in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has declined to entertain a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand order, holding that when the show cause notice (SCN) was...
![GST SCN Properly Uploaded, No Reply Filed: Delhi HC Declines Interference in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111021-gst-scn-properly-uploaded-delhi-hc-declines-interference-fraudulent-itc-case-taxscan.webp "GST SCN Properly Uploaded, No Reply Filed: Delhi HC Declines Interference in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Reaffirms Concurrent Powers of JAO and FAO to Issue S.148 Reassessment Notices [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110522-reassessment-notices-taxscan.jfif "Delhi HC Reaffirms Concurrent Powers of JAO and FAO to Issue S.148 Reassessment Notices [Read Order]")
Typo in GST SCN Showing Wrong Year for Reply Deadline Not Enough to Invalidate Proceedings: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court recently held that a mere typographical error in a Goods and Services Tax (GST) show cause notice (SCN), where the due date for filing a reply was incorrectly mentioned as 28...
![Typo in GST SCN Showing Wrong Year for Reply Deadline Not Enough to Invalidate Proceedings: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/500x300_2110313-971c4fad-2c90-4a93-a9e1-2e22757653be.webp "Typo in GST SCN Showing Wrong Year for Reply Deadline Not Enough to Invalidate Proceedings: Delhi HC [Read Order]")