![Financial Debt Default of over Rs. 45 Crores: NCLT Admits SBIs Application and Initiates CIRP Against Giga Pipe Systems [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/05/500x300_2102556-financial-debt-nclt-sbi-cirp-giga-pipe-systems.webp "Financial Debt Default of over Rs. 45 Crores: NCLT Admits SBIs Application and Initiates CIRP Against Giga Pipe Systems [Read Order]")
Financial Debt Default of over Rs. 45 Crores: NCLT Admits SBI's Application and Initiates CIRP Against Giga Pipe Systems [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, has admitted an application filed by the State Bank of India (SBI) under Section 7 of...
![NCLT Initiates Insolvency against Labhanshi Multitrade Over Rs. 1.17 Crore Default [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/250x150_2101500-ncl-insolvency-taxscan.webp "NCLT Initiates Insolvency against Labhanshi Multitrade Over Rs. 1.17 Crore Default [Read Order]")
![NCLAT sets aside NCLT Order as Appellant Not Heard, remands Settled Insolvency Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/250x150_2101239-nclat-mumbai-nclt-order-nclat-sets-aside-taxscan.webp "NCLAT sets aside NCLT Order as Appellant Not Heard, remands Settled Insolvency Matter [Read Order]")
![Company Appeal at Behest of Shareholder not Maintainable: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/21/250x150_2078905-company-appeal-shareholder-maintainabl-nclat-taxscan.webp "Company Appeal at Behest of Shareholder not Maintainable: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![NCLT directs Liquidation u/s 33 of IBC in absence of Resolution Plan even after Extending Time Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2077888-nclt-nclt-directs-liquidation-section-33-of-ibc-taxscan-.webp "NCLT directs Liquidation u/s 33 of IBC in absence of Resolution Plan even after Extending Time Period [Read Order]")
![DRT Directs to Admit Application filed by Financial Creditor u/s 126 (1) of IBC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/500x300_2077863-drt-drt-directs-to-admit-application-application-filed-by-financial-creditor-taxscan.webp "DRT Directs to Admit Application filed by Financial Creditor u/s 126 (1) of IBC [Read Order]")
Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)has held that proceedings initiated under section 7 of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 is not...
![Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2071830-proceedings-ibc-financial-creditor-received-pending-amount-nclat-taxscan.webp "Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Application for extension of time period for passing an arbitral award u/s 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) is maintainable even after Expiry of 12 month: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court observed that an application for extension of the time period for passing an arbitral award under Section 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) is maintainable even after the expiry...
NCLAT Rejects Suspended Director’s Challenge to CIRP, Asserts Timely Resolution over Procedural Technicalities [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) recently dismissed an appeal filed by a suspended director who challenged the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on...
![NCLAT Rejects Suspended Director’s Challenge to CIRP, Asserts Timely Resolution over Procedural Technicalities [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070770-nclat.webp "NCLAT Rejects Suspended Director’s Challenge to CIRP, Asserts Timely Resolution over Procedural Technicalities [Read Order]")
Insufficiently Stamped Agreements Not a Bar to Application for CIRP u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru Bench, ruled that insufficiently stamped agreement is not a bar to admission of petition filed under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016, read with Rule 4...
![Insufficiently Stamped Agreements Not a Bar to Application for CIRP u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Stamped-Agreements-site-img.jpg "Insufficiently Stamped Agreements Not a Bar to Application for CIRP u/s 7 of IBC: NCLT [Read Order]")
Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi has ruled that a financial creditor's ability to seek redress under Section 7 of the law is not in any way restricted by a dispute that...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
