![Charge of Clandestine Removal Must be Proved with Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Charge-Clandestine-Removal-Proved-Corroborative-Evidence-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.webp "Charge of Clandestine Removal Must be Proved with Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Charge of Clandestine Removal Must be Proved with Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the Revenue has not shown enough supporting...
![Jharkhand HC upholds GST ITC Time Limit u/s 16(4) and GSTR 3B validity under Amendment to Rule 61(5) of CGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/GST-ITC-Jharkhand-HC-CGST-GSTR-3B-GST-Council-ITC-Time-Limit-Central-Goods-and-Services-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Jharkhand HC upholds GST ITC Time Limit u/s 16(4) and GSTR 3B validity under Amendment to Rule 61(5) of CGST Act [Read Order]")
![No Compulsion shall be put on Individuals to give evidence after Office Hours in GST Cases: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/evidence-Office-Hours-in-GST-Cases-Jharkhand-HC-TAXSCAN.webp "No Compulsion shall be put on Individuals to give evidence after Office Hours in GST Cases: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
![Failure to Prove Genuineness of Creditors: Jharkhand HC upholds Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Genuineness-of-Creditors-Jharkhand-HC-Income-Tax-Addition-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Prove Genuineness of Creditors: Jharkhand HC upholds Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
Jharkhand HC Directs State GST Authorities to Proceed on Wrong ITC Availment Despite Summons Issued by DGGI and CGST Preventive Wing [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court, while disposing the writ application, directed the State Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) authorities to continue with proceedings on wrong Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment...
![Jharkhand HC Directs State GST Authorities to Proceed on Wrong ITC Availment Despite Summons Issued by DGGI and CGST Preventive Wing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Jharkhand-HC-State-GST-Authorities-ITC-Availment-DGGI-CGST-CGST-Preventive-Wing-taxscan-1.webp "Jharkhand HC Directs State GST Authorities to Proceed on Wrong ITC Availment Despite Summons Issued by DGGI and CGST Preventive Wing [Read Order]")
Jharkhand HC quashes Criminal Proceedings for Non-compliance with GST Summons u/s 70 of CGST Act [Read Order]
A Single Bench of the Jharkhand High Court quashed the criminal proceedings for non-compliance with gst summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The...
![Jharkhand HC quashes Criminal Proceedings for Non-compliance with GST Summons u/s 70 of CGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Jharkhand-HC-jharkhand-high-court-Criminal-Proceedings-GST-Summons-gst-CGST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Jharkhand HC quashes Criminal Proceedings for Non-compliance with GST Summons u/s 70 of CGST Act [Read Order]")
Income Tax Refund Adjusted against Outstanding Demands: Jharkhand HC quashes Criminal Proceedings [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court quashed the criminal proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the income tax refund was adjusted against outstanding demands. Gunwant Singh Saluja, the petitioner...
![Income Tax Refund Adjusted against Outstanding Demands: Jharkhand HC quashes Criminal Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Income-Tax-Refund-Adjusted-Income-Tax-Refund-Tax-Refund-Refund-Adjusted-Income-Tax-Adjusted-Outstanding-Demands-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Refund Adjusted against Outstanding Demands: Jharkhand HC quashes Criminal Proceedings [Read Order]")
7 Years Time For Adjudication Proceedings u/s 73(1) of Finance Act Not a Reasonable Period: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court has held that 7 Years for adjudication proceedings under section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 is not a reasonable period. The petitioner, M/S Kamaladitya Construction...
![7 Years Time For Adjudication Proceedings u/s 73(1) of Finance Act Not a Reasonable Period: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Time-For-Adjudication-Proceedings-Adjudication-Proceedings-Finance-Act-Not-a-Reasonable-Period-Reasonable-Period-Jharkhand-High-Court-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "7 Years Time For Adjudication Proceedings u/s 73(1) of Finance Act Not a Reasonable Period: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
No Material Evidence to Prove Commission of offences of Money Laundering: Jharkhand HC Grants Bail on bond [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court while entertaining a human trafficking case, granted bail to the petitioner on the grounds that no material evidence was found to prove the commissioner of offences of money...
![No Material Evidence to Prove Commission of offences of Money Laundering: Jharkhand HC Grants Bail on bond [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/No-Material-Evidence-to-Prove-Commission-of-offences-of-Money-Laundering-Jharkhand-HC-Grants-Bail-on-bond-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Material Evidence to Prove Commission of offences of Money Laundering: Jharkhand HC Grants Bail on bond [Read Order]")
