Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-Up
This weekly round-up analytically summarises the key stories related to the Supreme Court & High Courts reported at Taxscan.in during the...
![Non-Resident Assessee need not Mandatorily have PE in India: Supreme Court remands Disallowance to AO [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099245-non-resident-assessee-mandatorily-have-pe-in-india-supreme-court-disallowance-to-ao-taxscan.webp "Non-Resident Assessee need not Mandatorily have PE in India: Supreme Court remands Disallowance to AO [Read Judgement]")
![Supreme Court Upholds VAT ITC Benefit to Bona Fide Dealers [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/13/250x150_2096306-vat-itc.webp "Supreme Court Upholds VAT ITC Benefit to Bona Fide Dealers [Read Order]")
![Appeals on Breach of Exemption Notification Conditions Lie with HC u/s 130 of Customs Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/09/250x150_2084903-customs-act-supreme-court-appeals-on-breach-exemption-notification-taxscan.webp "Appeals on Breach of Exemption Notification Conditions Lie with HC u/s 130 of Customs Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
Supreme Court Clarifies Bombay HC Erred in Treating CESTAT’s Finding on Black Firing Guns as Misdeclaration Instead of Misclassification [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India held that the Bombay High Court wrongly recorded that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had accepted the Commissioner’s...
![Supreme Court Clarifies Bombay HC Erred in Treating CESTAT’s Finding on Black Firing Guns as Misdeclaration Instead of Misclassification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/03/500x300_2083783-supreme-court-bombay-hc-cestat-black-firing-guns-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Clarifies Bombay HC Erred in Treating CESTAT’s Finding on Black Firing Guns as Misdeclaration Instead of Misclassification [Read Order]")
Extended Period u/s 11A of CEA Cannot be Invoked without Misstatement or Suppression: SC Finds No Error in Tribunal’s Ruling on Kalyan Jewellers [Read Judegement]
The Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against Kalyan Jewellers India Pvt. Ltd., confirming the finding of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) that the...
![Extended Period u/s 11A of CEA Cannot be Invoked without Misstatement or Suppression: SC Finds No Error in Tribunal’s Ruling on Kalyan Jewellers [Read Judegement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/02/500x300_2083538-kalyan-jewellers-taxscan.webp "Extended Period u/s 11A of CEA Cannot be Invoked without Misstatement or Suppression: SC Finds No Error in Tribunal’s Ruling on Kalyan Jewellers [Read Judegement]")
Vehicles Used Only Inside Enclosed Industrial Premises Not Liable to Motor Vehicle Tax: Supreme Court [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court held that vehicles which are used only inside enclosed industrial premises not accessible to the general public are not liable to motor vehicle tax under ...
![Vehicles Used Only Inside Enclosed Industrial Premises Not Liable to Motor Vehicle Tax: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/31/500x300_2082503-vehicles-used-inside-enclosed-industrial-premises-motor-vehicle-tax-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Vehicles Used Only Inside Enclosed Industrial Premises Not Liable to Motor Vehicle Tax: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [May 24th to May 31st, 2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Supreme-Court-High-court-Supreme-Court-judgments-TAXSCAN.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [May 24th to May 31st, 2025]")
Specific Role of Director Need Not Be Detailed in Cheque Dishonour Complaint: Supreme Court Clarifies Vicarious Liability u/s 141 of NI Act [Read Judgement]
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India held that a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, does not require a detailed...
![Specific Role of Director Need Not Be Detailed in Cheque Dishonour Complaint: Supreme Court Clarifies Vicarious Liability u/s 141 of NI Act [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Supreme-Court-Section-141-NI-Act-TAXSCAN-2.jpg "Specific Role of Director Need Not Be Detailed in Cheque Dishonour Complaint: Supreme Court Clarifies Vicarious Liability u/s 141 of NI Act [Read Judgement]")
Failure to Implement Resolution Plan even after 5 years: Supreme Court Orders Liquidation of Jet Airways [Read Judgement]
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to order the liquidation of Jet Airways in the circumstance that the resolution plan...
142 Days Delay in Filing Appeal is not Condonable u/s 62 of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code: Supreme Court dismisses Petition [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India Dismisses the civil appeal filed by the state revenue department as the delay of 142 days is more excessive than the delay condonable under Section 62 of the Insolvency...
