Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Time to Deposit Balance E-Auction Bid Amount Can Be Extended Under Article 226 in Exceptional Cases: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Deposit-Balance-E-Auction-Bid-Amount-Deposit-Balance-Extended-Under-Article-226-txascan.jpg "Time to Deposit Balance E-Auction Bid Amount Can Be Extended Under Article 226 in Exceptional Cases: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Time to Deposit Balance E-Auction Bid Amount Can Be Extended Under Article 226 in Exceptional Cases: Kerala HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Kerala High Court held that the time for remitting the balance bid amount in an e-auction conducted by the Debt Recovery...
![Appeal preferred against Assessment Order under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC stays Recovery of Amount [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Kerala-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-Assessment-Order-Income-Tax-news-Taxscan.jpg "Appeal preferred against Assessment Order under Income Tax Act: Kerala HC stays Recovery of Amount [Read Order]")
Rejection of LLP Incorporation application on Ground of conflicting Trademark not justified: Kerala High Court slams MCA officials for ‘System Generated Harassment’ [Read Judgment]
In a significant ruling allowing relief to the petitioners, the Kerala High Court held that the Registrar of Company not justified in declining incorporation of LLP on the ground of similarity of...
![Rejection of LLP Incorporation application on Ground of conflicting Trademark not justified: Kerala High Court slams MCA officials for ‘System Generated Harassment’ [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Rejection-of-LLP-Incorporation-application-Ground-of-conflicting-Trademark-Kerala-High-Court-MCA-officials-System-Generated-Harrassment-Taxscan.jpg "Rejection of LLP Incorporation application on Ground of conflicting Trademark not justified: Kerala High Court slams MCA officials for ‘System Generated Harassment’ [Read Judgment]")
Revised Amount must be taken as quantified amount to test eligibility of Hi-Lite Project for availing benefit of SVLDR Scheme 2019: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High court in the light of the circular dated July 28, 2019, held that the Revised amount must be taken as the quantified amount to test the eligibility of the petitioner, Hi-Lite Project...
![Revised Amount must be taken as quantified amount to test eligibility of Hi-Lite Project for availing benefit of SVLDR Scheme 2019: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/SVLDR-Scheme-Hi-Lite-Project-Revised-amount-Taxscan.jpg "Revised Amount must be taken as quantified amount to test eligibility of Hi-Lite Project for availing benefit of SVLDR Scheme 2019: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Petitioner failed to quote Tax Amounts even though the conditions required disclosure of Tax burden, tender can’t be accepted: Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court noted that the prime reason for the respondents for not accepting the tender of the petitioner is that the petitioner did not quote tax amounts even though the conditions...
