No Customs Penalty for Misdeclaring Goods in Airway Bills: CESTAT sets aside ₹2L Penalty on Ajanta Pharma [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) recently allowed an appeal filed by Ajanta Pharma Ltd. and set...
![‘GSTAT Now Functional’: Telangana HC Directs to File Appeal Before Tribunal, Denies Adjustment of Tax Paid as Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/05/250x150_2102583-gstat-telangana-hc-adjustment-of-tax-pre-deposit-file-appeal-before-tribunal-taxscan.webp "‘GSTAT Now Functional’: Telangana HC Directs to File Appeal Before Tribunal, Denies Adjustment of Tax Paid as Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
![Penalty for Delayed Excise Duty Payment to Be Calculated Only for Actual Days of Delay, Not Entire Month: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/250x150_2101877-penalty-delayed-excise-duty-payment-calculated-actual-delay-cestat-txn.webp "Penalty for Delayed Excise Duty Payment to Be Calculated Only for Actual Days of Delay, Not Entire Month: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/250x150_2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]")
![AO fails to Specify Sub-Clause u/s 270A(9): ITAT deletes Penalty for Under-Reporting [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/28/250x150_2100468-ao-sub-clause-us-270a9-itat-penalty-under-reporting-taxscan.webp "AO fails to Specify Sub-Clause u/s 270A(9): ITAT deletes Penalty for Under-Reporting [Read Order]")
Confiscation of 699.310 Grams of Gold Valued at Rs. 27.90 Lakh: Gauhati HC Rules Customs Appeal Not Maintainable as Value Below Rs. 1 Crore [Read Order]
The HIgh Court of Gauhati, in a case involving the confiscation of 699.310 grams of gold valued at Rs. 27.90 lakh, ruled that the Customs Department’s appeal was not maintainable as the value...
![Confiscation of 699.310 Grams of Gold Valued at Rs. 27.90 Lakh: Gauhati HC Rules Customs Appeal Not Maintainable as Value Below Rs. 1 Crore [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/25/500x300_2099725-gold-confiscated-taxscan.webp "Confiscation of 699.310 Grams of Gold Valued at Rs. 27.90 Lakh: Gauhati HC Rules Customs Appeal Not Maintainable as Value Below Rs. 1 Crore [Read Order]")
Challenge on Supply of Reagent with equipment is ‘Composite Supply’ or ‘Mixed Supply’: Delhi HC Leaves Issue to Appellate Authority [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has declined to adjudicate on whether the supply of reagents along with diagnostic equipment constitutes a ‘composite supply’ or a ‘mixed supply’ under the Goods and Services...
![Challenge on Supply of Reagent with equipment is ‘Composite Supply’ or ‘Mixed Supply’: Delhi HC Leaves Issue to Appellate Authority [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/13/500x300_2096158-mixed-supply-composite-supply-taxscan.webp "Challenge on Supply of Reagent with equipment is ‘Composite Supply’ or ‘Mixed Supply’: Delhi HC Leaves Issue to Appellate Authority [Read Order]")
Income Tax Commissioner adjudicates Penalty Order instead of Re-assessment Order: ITAT Remands Sale Consideration Challenge for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Nagpur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the sale consideration matter to the Commissioner, as it had adjudicated the penalty order instead of the re-assessment order. ...
![Income Tax Commissioner adjudicates Penalty Order instead of Re-assessment Order: ITAT Remands Sale Consideration Challenge for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/10/500x300_2095389-penalty-order-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Commissioner adjudicates Penalty Order instead of Re-assessment Order: ITAT Remands Sale Consideration Challenge for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Lack of Due Diligence in Valuation of Rs. 1000 Crore Assets: IBBI Suspends Valuer's Registration for 2 Years [Read Order]
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has suspended the registration of a Registered Valuer for a period of two years for lack of due diligence in the valuation of assets worth Rs....
![Lack of Due Diligence in Valuation of Rs. 1000 Crore Assets: IBBI Suspends Valuers Registration for 2 Years [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/09/500x300_2095164-ibbi-registration-of-suspended-registered-valuer-entity-stay-order-bombay-high-court-taxscan.webp "Lack of Due Diligence in Valuation of Rs. 1000 Crore Assets: IBBI Suspends Valuers Registration for 2 Years [Read Order]")
Re-Export of Misclassified Textile Fabric: Madras HC Allows Importer to Ship Back Goods to China on Conditions [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has permitted a Mumbai-based importer to re-export 798 bales of textile fabric coated with plastics to its Chinese supplier, subject to strict conditions. The petitioner,...
![Re-Export of Misclassified Textile Fabric: Madras HC Allows Importer to Ship Back Goods to China on Conditions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/08/500x300_2094817-madras-nc-taxscan-.webp "Re-Export of Misclassified Textile Fabric: Madras HC Allows Importer to Ship Back Goods to China on Conditions [Read Order]")
Penalty Paid to Third Parties for Breach of Contract Not Hit by Explanation u/s 37(1): ITAT Deletes ₹34.71 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the penalty paid to third parties for breach of contract does not come under the explanation of Sec 37(1). ITAT deleted the...
![Penalty Paid to Third Parties for Breach of Contract Not Hit by Explanation u/s 37(1): ITAT Deletes ₹34.71 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093008-2061821-penalty-hc-taxscan.webp "Penalty Paid to Third Parties for Breach of Contract Not Hit by Explanation u/s 37(1): ITAT Deletes ₹34.71 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]")
AO Erred in Disallowing ₹1.89 Cr Penalty & Other Expenses: ITAT remands ₹73.26 Lakh UIL Penny-Stock Loss for Fresh Examination [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that the AO erred in disallowing ₹1.89 Cr penalty and other expenses. The bench remanded ₹73.26 Lakh UIL penny-stock loss for fresh...
![AO Erred in Disallowing ₹1.89 Cr Penalty & Other Expenses: ITAT remands ₹73.26 Lakh UIL Penny-Stock Loss for Fresh Examination [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093002-ao-penalty-itat-uil-penny-stock-taxscan.webp "AO Erred in Disallowing ₹1.89 Cr Penalty & Other Expenses: ITAT remands ₹73.26 Lakh UIL Penny-Stock Loss for Fresh Examination [Read Order]")