Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Order in Deceaseds Name Despite Condonation of Delay Application by Legal Heir for Late ITR Filing: Madras HC directs Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-Directs-Reconsideration-Order-in-Deceaseds-Name-Condonation-of-Delay-taxscan.jpg "Order in Deceaseds Name Despite Condonation of Delay Application by Legal Heir for Late ITR Filing: Madras HC directs Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Order in Deceased's Name Despite Condonation of Delay Application by Legal Heir for Late ITR Filing: Madras HC directs Reconsideration [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court directed the tax authorities to reconsider an order issued in the name of a deceased individual despite a...
![Madras HC Condones Delayed ITR Filing Due to Audit Report Delay and Covid, Interprets S. 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act Liberally [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ITR-Audit-report-delay-Condonation-of-delayed-itr-filing-delayed-itr-filing-Agricultural-society-ITR-filing-deadline-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Condones Delayed ITR Filing Due to Audit Report Delay and Covid, Interprets S. 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act Liberally [Read Order]")
![Denial of Exemption Claim u/s 10(23C) (VI) of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to Consider Stay Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Kerala-High-Court-Denial-of-Exemption-Claim-Income-Tax-Income-tax-news-Audit-Report-TAXSCAN.jpg "Denial of Exemption Claim u/s 10(23C) (VI) of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to Consider Stay Petition [Read Order]")
![Jurisdiction to consider Application u/s 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, is not vested with Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as Refund claim being above 10 Lakhs: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Kerala-High-Court-Chief-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Tax-jurisdiction-Refund-claim-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Jurisdiction to consider Application u/s 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, is not vested with Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as Refund claim being above 10 Lakhs: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
PCIT u/s 119(2) (b) has no power to consider Merits of Claim while Condoning Delay in Filing Return: Kerala HC dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court while dismissing the writ petition has held that Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 119(2) (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has no power to consider merits...
![PCIT u/s 119(2) (b) has no power to consider Merits of Claim while Condoning Delay in Filing Return: Kerala HC dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/PCIT-Condoning-Delay-in-Filing-Return-Kerala-High-Court-Writ-Petition-Merits-of-Claim-Condoning-Delay-.jpg "PCIT u/s 119(2) (b) has no power to consider Merits of Claim while Condoning Delay in Filing Return: Kerala HC dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]")
Delay Condonation Application rejected after 20 years: Allahabad High Court quashes order and Demands Reconstruction of Records [Read Order]
The High Court of Allahabad has quashed an order that rejected a delay condonation application after an astonishing 20 year lapse. The Principal Commissioner had rejected the application for...
![Delay Condonation Application rejected after 20 years: Allahabad High Court quashes order and Demands Reconstruction of Records [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Delay-Condonation-Application-Rejected-Allahabad-High-Court-Quashes-Order-Demands-Reconstruction-Records-taxscan.jpg "Delay Condonation Application rejected after 20 years: Allahabad High Court quashes order and Demands Reconstruction of Records [Read Order]")
Reason for an Order passed by a Quasi-Judicial Authority should not be supplemented by any Memorandum or Affidavit: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
In a recent decision, the division bench of the Madras High Court held that an order passed by a Quasi-Judicial Authority should involve valid reasons. Such reasons cannot be explained subsequently...
![Reason for an Order passed by a Quasi-Judicial Authority should not be supplemented by any Memorandum or Affidavit: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Reason for an Order passed by a Quasi-Judicial Authority should not be supplemented by any Memorandum or Affidavit: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")