![Bogus Purchase Addition Without Adequate Verification: ITAT Restores ₹8.79 Lakh Matter to AO for Re-adjudication with Opportunity to Taxpayer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2069863-itat-ahmedabad-income-tax-bogus-purchases-citing-genuine-sales-taxscan-1.webp "Bogus Purchase Addition Without Adequate Verification: ITAT Restores ₹8.79 Lakh Matter to AO for Re-adjudication with Opportunity to Taxpayer [Read Order]")
Bogus Purchase Addition Without Adequate Verification: ITAT Restores ₹8.79 Lakh Matter to AO for Re-adjudication with Opportunity to Taxpayer [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the matter involving bogus purchase addition of Rs. 8.79 lakh to the...
![Invalid Bank Account in ITR Filed: Rajasthan HC Sets aside Proceedings u/s 148AÂ of Income Tax Act due to Procedural Violation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Bank-Account-ITR-filed-Rajasthan-HC-Income-Tax-Act-Procedural-Violation-taxscan.jpg "Invalid Bank Account in ITR Filed: Rajasthan HC Sets aside Proceedings u/s 148AÂ of Income Tax Act due to Procedural Violation [Read Order]")
![Verification Failures in Disputed Purchases and Labour Expenses: ITAT upholds 12.5% Addition on Alleged Bogus Purchases [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Disputed-purchases-Labour-Expenses-Alleqed-Boqus-Purchases-taxscan.jpg "Verification Failures in Disputed Purchases and Labour Expenses: ITAT upholds 12.5% Addition on Alleged Bogus Purchases [Read Order]")
![Order Freezing Bank Accounts not to Remain in Force Sixty Days from Date of Order under Sub-Section (8-A) to Section 132 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Delhi-high-court-freezing-of-bank-accounts-Income-tax-acts-Section-132-TAXSCAN.jpg "Order Freezing Bank Accounts not to Remain in Force Sixty Days from Date of Order under Sub-Section (8-A) to Section 132 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Opportunity to be Heard Denied:Â ITAT deletes addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Opportunity-Heard-Denied-ITAT-addition-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Opportunity to be Heard Denied:Â ITAT deletes addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Deletion of Addition u/s 68 against Bharat Auto based on Vague, Unsubstantiate and Cryptic Findings: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Notification]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed re-adjudication as the deletion of addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 Bharat Auto was based on vague,...
![Deletion of Addition u/s 68 against Bharat Auto based on Vague, Unsubstantiate and Cryptic Findings: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Deletion-of-Addition-Bharat-Auto-based-on-Vague-Unsubstantiate-and-Cryptic-Findings-ITAT-Directs-Re-adjudication-Re-adjudication-ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Deletion of Addition u/s 68 against Bharat Auto based on Vague, Unsubstantiate and Cryptic Findings: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Notification]")
Due Opportunity shall be provided to Assessee for establishing a case of Non-receipt of Statutory Notices: ITAT set aside Order of CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that due opportunity shall be provided to the assessee for establishing a case of non-receipt of the statutory notice. The assessee...
![Due Opportunity shall be provided to Assessee for establishing a case of Non-receipt of Statutory Notices: ITAT set aside Order of CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Due-Opportunity-Assessee-establishing-Non-receipt-Statutory-Notices-ITAT-Order-CITA-TAXSCAN.jpg "Due Opportunity shall be provided to Assessee for establishing a case of Non-receipt of Statutory Notices: ITAT set aside Order of CIT(A) [Read Order]")
ITAT directs AO to use judicious approach and call for confirmation U/S 133(6) on grounds of Information not being provided in prescribed format and duly signed by CA [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that Information not being provided in prescribed format and duly signed by CA gives AO authority to use judicious approach and call...
![ITAT directs AO to use judicious approach and call for confirmation U/S 133(6) on grounds of Information not being provided in prescribed format and duly signed by CA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ITAT-AO-ITAT-directs-AO-to-use-judicious-approach-and-call-for-confirmation-CA-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs AO to use judicious approach and call for confirmation U/S 133(6) on grounds of Information not being provided in prescribed format and duly signed by CA [Read Order]")
Mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an Order: ITAT deletes Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an order hence addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act,...
![Mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an Order: ITAT deletes Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-Suspicion-place-for-the-purpose-of-passing-an-Order-ITAT-deletes-Addition-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an Order: ITAT deletes Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Absence of Cross-Verification u/s 133(6) Should Not Be Sole Basis to Disallow Expenses: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the absence of cross-verification under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should not be taken as the sole basis to...
![Absence of Cross-Verification u/s 133(6) Should Not Be Sole Basis to Disallow Expenses: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Absence-of-Cross-Verification-Disallow-Expenses-ITAT-Cross-Verification-taxscan.jpg "Absence of Cross-Verification u/s 133(6) Should Not Be Sole Basis to Disallow Expenses: ITAT [Read Order]")