![Is DRP Procedure Bound by Time Limitation u/s.153? Split Verdict Leads Supreme Court Division Bench to Urge CJI to Form Specific Bench [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/500x300_2075691-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Is DRP Procedure Bound by Time Limitation u/s.153? Split Verdict Leads Supreme Court Division Bench to Urge CJI to Form Specific Bench [Read Judgement]")
Is DRP Procedure Bound by Time Limitation u/s.153? Split Verdict Leads Supreme Court Division Bench to Urge CJI to Form Specific Bench [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a split verdict on whether the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) process under Section 144C of the Income...
![Kerala HC Stays Recovery Proceedings for One Month as Petitioners Shift Appeals to Tribunal u/s 253(1)(d) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/250x150_2067071-kerala-hc-kerala-hc-stays-recovery-proceedings-recovery-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Kerala HC Stays Recovery Proceedings for One Month as Petitioners Shift Appeals to Tribunal u/s 253(1)(d) [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Final Assessment order as it was passed beyond the period of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/TAT-ITAT-Mumbai-ITAT-quashes-Final-Assessment-order-Assessment-order-Final-Assessment-order-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Final Assessment order as it was passed beyond the period of Limitation [Read Order]")
![[BREAKING] Budget 2025: Income Tax Dispute Resolution Panel to have Delayed Implementation of Faceless Scheme](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Budget-2025-Income-Tax-Dispute-Resolution-Panel-Delayed-Implementation-Faceless-Scheme-taxscan.jpg "[BREAKING] Budget 2025: Income Tax Dispute Resolution Panel to have Delayed Implementation of Faceless Scheme")
![Delhi HC Rejects Challenge to Assessment Order u/s 143(3), Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost for Frivolous Litigation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Delhi-high-court-Income-Tax-Section-143-3-of-Income-Tax-Act-Section-143-3-of-ITA-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC Rejects Challenge to Assessment Order u/s 143(3), Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost for Frivolous Litigation [Read Order]")
Madras HC Sets Aside Draft Assessment Issued u/s 144C Due to Failure to Address Objections, Remands Matter [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court set aside the draft assessment issued under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the assessing officer ( AO ). This decision was made due to AO’s...
AO fails to Implement DRP Directions while Passing Final Assessment Order: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) quashed the assessment order after finding that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) failed to implement Dispute Resolution Panel ( DRP )...
![AO fails to Implement DRP Directions while Passing Final Assessment Order: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ITAT-Delhi-ITAT-Assessment-Order-Dispute-Resolution-Panel-DRP-Dispute-Resolution-Panel-guidelines-Taxscan.jpg "AO fails to Implement DRP Directions while Passing Final Assessment Order: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Interconnect usage charges paid to foreign Telecom Operators not Taxable in India under India-Sri Lanka DTAA: ITAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) observed that Interconnect usage charges paid to foreign Telecom Operators Not Taxable in India under India-Sri Lanka...
![Interconnect usage charges paid to foreign Telecom Operators not Taxable in India under India-Sri Lanka DTAA: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-foreign-Telecom-Operators-taxscan.jpg "Interconnect usage charges paid to foreign Telecom Operators not Taxable in India under India-Sri Lanka DTAA: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessment Order passed u/s 144C(3) r.w.s. 144C(4) of Income Tax Act beyond 1 Month on Failure to file Objection within Period as per Section 144C is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that assessment order passed under Section 144C(3) read with Section 144C(4) of the Income Tax Act 1961 beyond one month on...
![Assessment Order passed u/s 144C(3) r.w.s. 144C(4) of Income Tax Act beyond 1 Month on Failure to file Objection within Period as per Section 144C is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Assessment-Order-Income-Tax-Act-Failure-to-file-Objection-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Assessment Order passed u/s 144C(3) r.w.s. 144C(4) of Income Tax Act beyond 1 Month on Failure to file Objection within Period as per Section 144C is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
AO cannot pass final Assessment Order without complying with Mandatory Requirement under section 144C of Income Tax Act: ITAT allows Appeal [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, held that assessing officers could not pass a final assessment order without complying with the mandatory requirements under Section 144C of the...
![AO cannot pass final Assessment Order without complying with Mandatory Requirement under section 144C of Income Tax Act: ITAT allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AO-final-assessment-order-mandatory-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-allows-Appeal-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "AO cannot pass final Assessment Order without complying with Mandatory Requirement under section 144C of Income Tax Act: ITAT allows Appeal [Read Order]")
TNMM is most appropriate method for International Transactions: Delhi HC upholds Tribunal’s Order [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court upheld the order of the Tribunal as the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is the most appropriate method for international transactions. M/s Hellmann Worldwide Logistics...
Absence of Express Agreement for Brand Promotion Excludes AMP Expenditure as International Transaction: ITAT deletes Addition on Kellogg India
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the transactions in question would not constitute international transaction relating to AMP expenditure. The Assessee...
