Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order] Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/16/500x300_2120026-itat-rules-favour-bajaj-housing-finance-ltd-taxscan.webp)
Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the penalty against Bajaj Housing Finance, holding that such a penalty will be invalid as the...


![Mere Change in Head of Loss Does Not Constitute Under-Reporting u/s 270A: ITAT Deletes ₹15.19 Cr Penalty [Read Order] Mere Change in Head of Loss Does Not Constitute Under-Reporting u/s 270A: ITAT Deletes ₹15.19 Cr Penalty [Read Order]](/images/placeholder.jpg)
![ITAT Grants Cummins India ₹210 Cr Relief, Deletes ₹12.7 Cr TP Adjustment, Upholds 10AA & 80JJAA Claims Despite One‑Day Delay in Return Filing [Read Order] ITAT Grants Cummins India ₹210 Cr Relief, Deletes ₹12.7 Cr TP Adjustment, Upholds 10AA & 80JJAA Claims Despite One‑Day Delay in Return Filing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/250x150_2114187-itat-grants-cummins-india-210-cr-relief-deletes-127-cr-tp-adjustment-claims-despite-oneday-delay-return-filing-taxscan.webp)

![Mere Claim of Higher Gratuity Exemption Claim through Revised ITR Does Not Amount to Misreporting: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order] Mere Claim of Higher Gratuity Exemption Claim through Revised ITR Does Not Amount to Misreporting: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/11/250x150_2095645-gratuity-exemption-claim-itr-itat-penalty-taxscan.webp)
![AO not competent to pass Draft Assessment Order u/s 144C(1) of Income Tax Act when TPO Makes no Variation: Bombay HC [Read Order] AO not competent to pass Draft Assessment Order u/s 144C(1) of Income Tax Act when TPO Makes no Variation: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/19/500x300_2088582-ao-draft-assessment-order-income-tax-act-tpo-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp)
![Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order] Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/16/500x300_2077533-mere-disallowance-capitalized-interest-itat-income-tax-penalty-taxscan.webp)
![Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order] Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/06/500x300_2073465-salaried-taxpayer-income-tax-penalty-income-tax-taxscan.webp)
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [ June 28th to July 5th, 2025] Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [ June 28th to July 5th, 2025]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/05/500x300_2059509-supreme-court-high-courts-weekly-round-up-taxscan.webp)
![Income Tax Penalty Notice Not Properly Served Initially, Reminded after 4 Months of its Issuance: Madras HC Directs Decision After Hearing [Read Order] Income Tax Penalty Notice Not Properly Served Initially, Reminded after 4 Months of its Issuance: Madras HC Directs Decision After Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/28/500x300_2055622-kerala-hc-income-tax-penalty-income-tax-income-tax-news-kerala-hc-news-high-court-of-kerala-high-court-section-274-section-44ab-assessment-taxscan.webp)

![ITAT Weekly Round-Up [April 1st-26th] ITAT Weekly Round-Up [April 1st-26th]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Income-tax-news-Income-tax-updates-ITAT-Tax-judgments-TAXSCAN.jpg)