Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Relief to SBI, Refund u/s 11B of Excise Act can be Claimed within One Year from Date of Payment: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/500x300_2090510-2062340-cestat-service-tax-demand-sbi-taxscan.webp "Relief to SBI, Refund u/s 11B of Excise Act can be Claimed within One Year from Date of Payment: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
Relief to SBI, Refund u/s 11B of Excise Act can be Claimed within One Year from Date of Payment: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
The High Court of Karnataka in ruling in favour of SBI has held that the refund under section 11B of Excise Act can be claimed within one...
![Commissioner of Central Excise is not a Court: Calcutta HC allows Appeal in absence Retraction of Statements [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Calcutta-High-Court-Commissioner-of-Central-Excise-Central-Excise-Retraction-of-Statements-taxscan.jpg "Commissioner of Central Excise is not a Court: Calcutta HC allows Appeal in absence Retraction of Statements [Read Order]")
![Revenue cannot take different Stand at different Point of Time and Impose Additional Duty Arbitrarily: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/JSW-Steel-Madras-High-Court-Additional-Duty-Taxscan.jpg "Revenue cannot take different Stand at different Point of Time and Impose Additional Duty Arbitrarily: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]")
Tax Appeals must be filed before Bench allotted to District where Dispute arose: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
A two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court has held that the tax appeals must be filed before the benches allotted to the districts where the dispute arose. The sole issue before the bench comprising...
![Tax Appeals must be filed before Bench allotted to District where Dispute arose: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tax-Appeals-Taxscan.jpg "Tax Appeals must be filed before Bench allotted to District where Dispute arose: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]")
Activity of Handling goods being part of composite agreement entered by third parties cannot be bifurcated under different heads for service tax Demand: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court, in its recent order, held that the activity of handling goods being part of the composite agreement entered into by third parties, cannot be bifurcated under different heads...
![Activity of Handling goods being part of composite agreement entered by third parties cannot be bifurcated under different heads for service tax Demand: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/service-tax-Demand-Activity-of-Handling-goods-third-parties-cannot-be-bifurcated-taxscan.jpg "Activity of Handling goods being part of composite agreement entered by third parties cannot be bifurcated under different heads for service tax Demand: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")