![No Recovery of Refunded Cess Amount by Revenue Department: J&K and Ladakh HC dismisses Appeal Filed with Delay of 1488 days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/No-Recovery-of-Refunded-Cess-Amount-Refunded-Cess-Amount-Revenue-Department-Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court-Appeal-Filed-taxscan.jpg "No Recovery of Refunded Cess Amount by Revenue Department: J&K and Ladakh HC dismisses Appeal Filed with Delay of 1488 days [Read Order]")
No Recovery of Refunded Cess Amount by Revenue Department: J&K and Ladakh HC dismisses Appeal Filed with Delay of 1488 days [Read Order]
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed appeal filed with delay of 1488 days and upheld the ruling that no recovery of refunded cess...
![Revenue Fails to Prove Unjust Enrichment on Sanctioned Erroneous Refund of Excise Duty: Jammu Kashmir &Ladak HC Â sets aside Extended Period of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Revenue-Revenue-Fails-Revenue-Fails-to-Prove-Unjust-Enrichment-on-Sanctioned-Erroneous-Refund-of-Excise-Duty-Enrichment-Enrichment-on-Sanctioned-Erroneous-Refund-taxscan.jpg "Revenue Fails to Prove Unjust Enrichment on Sanctioned Erroneous Refund of Excise Duty: Jammu Kashmir &Ladak HC Â sets aside Extended Period of Limitation [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax on Telecom Towers Erected at Site and Affixed to Earth: Bombay HC Quashes Demand of Ineligible Cenvat Credit against Tata Teleservices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Service-Tax-Telecom-Towers-Bombay-High-Court-Demand-Ineligible-Cenvat-Credit-Cenvat-Credit-Tata-Teleservices-Taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax on Telecom Towers Erected at Site and Affixed to Earth: Bombay HC Quashes Demand of Ineligible Cenvat Credit against Tata Teleservices [Read Order]")
![Appeal against CESTAT Order challenging Rate of Tax lies before Supreme Court: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Appeal-CESTAT-Order-Tax-Supreme-Court-Madhya-Pradesh-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Appeal against CESTAT Order challenging Rate of Tax lies before Supreme Court: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]")
Relief to SEBI: Bombay HC Upholds CESTAT Order deleting Service Tax Levy on Fee Collected from Entities [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Order deleting Service Tax Levy on Fee Collected from Entities, thereby granting relief to The Securities...
![Relief to SEBI: Bombay HC Upholds CESTAT Order deleting Service Tax Levy on Fee Collected from Entities [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SEBI-Bombay-High-Court-CESTAT-CESTAT-Order-Service-Tax-Levy-Fee-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Relief to SEBI: Bombay HC Upholds CESTAT Order deleting Service Tax Levy on Fee Collected from Entities [Read Order]")
Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a recent judgement, the Allahabad High Court (HC) held that pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed demand duty is mandatory to file an appeal under section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 Sri...
![Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Pre-deposit-Demand-Duty-appeal-Central-Excise-Act-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Pre-deposit of 7.5% of disputed Demand Duty is Mandatory to file appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
HC cannot Entertain an Appeal wherein ‘Rate of Duty’ or ‘Value of Goods’ is Disputed: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
While dismissing an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Kolhapur, a division bench of the Bombay High Court observed that in view of Section 35G of the Central Excise...
HC has No Jurisdiction to Entertain Appeal against the Orders of CESTAT where the dispute is relating to Taxability of Services: Punjab & Haryana HC
The division bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, recently in Commissioner Service Tax v. DLF Golf Resorts, dismissed an appeal preferred by the Revenue on the ground that the matter was...
