Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Clandestine Removal Charges Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Clandestine-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Clandestine Removal Charges Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Clandestine Removal Charges Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the charges of clandestine...
![Statements Retracted at Cross Examination have No Evidentiary Value Cannot be Relied Upon to Demand Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Statements-Retracted-Cross-Examination-No-Evidentiary-Value-Relied-Upon-to-Demand-Duty-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Statements Retracted at Cross Examination have No Evidentiary Value Cannot be Relied Upon to Demand Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Accounts Manager Tortured and Statement not Voluntarily Taken: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-CESTAT-quashes-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Demand-and-Penalty-Accounts-Manager-Accounts-Manager-Tortured-Voluntarily-Taken-taxscan.jpg "Accounts Manager Tortured and Statement not Voluntarily Taken: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand and Penalty [Read Order]")
![Admissibility of Computer Printouts as Evidence depends on compliance with section 36B(B) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Legal-Compliance-for-Evidence-Evidence-in-Central-Excise-Cases-Computer-Printouts-in-Legal-Proceedings-taxscan.jpg "Admissibility of Computer Printouts as Evidence depends on compliance with section 36B(B) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]")
![Computer Printouts can’t be admissible as evidence If Conditions u/s 36B-(2) & (4) of the Central Excise Act are not Satisfied: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Computer-Printouts-Taxscan.jpg "Computer Printouts can’t be admissible as evidence If Conditions u/s 36B-(2) & (4) of the Central Excise Act are not Satisfied: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Data Retrieved from the Laptop of CA cannot be used as an Incriminating Material against Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]
The CESTAT, Chandigarh in Mahalaxmi Distilleries v. CCE, Rohtak, held that the data retrieved from the laptop of the Chartered Accountant (CA) cannot be a sole basis for demand against the assesse...
![Data Retrieved from the Laptop of CA cannot be used as an Incriminating Material against Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Laptop-of-Chartered-Accountant.jpg "Data Retrieved from the Laptop of CA cannot be used as an Incriminating Material against Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")