Non‑Disclosure of Turnover and Wrong Availment of GST ITC: Delhi HC Directs Petitioner to Reply to SCN [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court, in a recent case, has directed the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice(SCN) as the petitioner had not disclosed the...
![GST Demand Beyond SCN Scope Violates S. 75(7): Allahabad HC Quashes ₹3.04 Cr Demand Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/11/250x150_2104106-gst-demand-scn-scope-violates-s-757-allahabad-hc-demand-order-taxscan.jfif "GST Demand Beyond SCN Scope Violates S. 75(7): Allahabad HC Quashes ₹3.04 Cr Demand Order [Read Order]")
![Failure to Reply to GST SCN: Madras HC Gives Assessee Second Chance, Orders Additional 15% Deposit and Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/08/250x150_2094803-gst-scn-hc-taxscan.webp "Failure to Reply to GST SCN: Madras HC Gives Assessee Second Chance, Orders Additional 15% Deposit and Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Failure to provide Personal Hearing even after 6 Months u/s 110(2) of Customs Act: Delhi HC directs to file statutory appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/250x150_2071854-delhi-hc-faliure-personal-hearing-denied-hearing-taxscan.webp "Failure to provide Personal Hearing even after 6 Months u/s 110(2) of Customs Act: Delhi HC directs to file statutory appeal [Read Order]")
MCA Penalises Private Limited Company & Directors for Furnishing Incorrect Information in Board's Report [Read Order]
In the adjudication order passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, a penalty of Rs. 2.25 lakhs was imposed for furnishing...
![MCA Penalises Private Limited Company & Directors for Furnishing Incorrect Information in Boards Report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/private-limited-company-TAXSCAN.jpg "MCA Penalises Private Limited Company & Directors for Furnishing Incorrect Information in Boards Report [Read Order]")
Failure to Address Auditor’s Remarks in Board Reports: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 3 lakhs on Company and Directors
In the adjudication passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, a total penalty of Rs. 3.5 lakhs was imposed on a company...
![Delhi HC temporarily lifts Liquor Sale Ban at Hauz Khas Social by Excise Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Liquor-Sale-Ban.jpg "Delhi HC temporarily lifts Liquor Sale Ban at Hauz Khas Social by Excise Dept [Read Order]")
Inappropriate Serving of SCN under CGST Act: Calcutta HC Dismisses Petition on Availability of Statutory Remedy [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ appeal on availability of statutory remedy against the inappropriate serving of show cause notice (SCN) under the Central Goods and...
Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that there cannot be dual custodianship of the same goods and set aside the Penalty imposed under Customs...
![Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-penalty-Imposed-under-Customs-Act-penalty-Customs-Act-penalty-Imposed-taxscan.jpg "Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Lack of Evidence and Section 11A(4) Misuse: CESTAT quashes ₹2.81 Cr Rule 6(3) Demand over Alleged Common Input Service Usage [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) struck down a demand of ₹2.81 Crore against the appellant ruling that the show cause notice ( SCN ) and the order...
![Lack of Evidence and Section 11A(4) Misuse: CESTAT quashes ₹2.81 Cr Rule 6(3) Demand over Alleged Common Input Service Usage [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Lack-of-Evidence-Input-Service-Usage-Section-11A4-show-cause-notice-taxscan.jpg "Lack of Evidence and Section 11A(4) Misuse: CESTAT quashes ₹2.81 Cr Rule 6(3) Demand over Alleged Common Input Service Usage [Read Order]")