MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and Directors for Failure to Approve and File Financial Statements and Board’s Report
In the adjudication order passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, the...
![MCA Penalises Private Limited Company & Directors for Furnishing Incorrect Information in Boards Report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/private-limited-company-TAXSCAN.jpg "MCA Penalises Private Limited Company & Directors for Furnishing Incorrect Information in Boards Report [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC temporarily lifts Liquor Sale Ban at Hauz Khas Social by Excise Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Liquor-Sale-Ban.jpg "Delhi HC temporarily lifts Liquor Sale Ban at Hauz Khas Social by Excise Dept [Read Order]")
Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that there cannot be dual custodianship of the same goods and set aside the Penalty imposed under Customs...
![Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-penalty-Imposed-under-Customs-Act-penalty-Customs-Act-penalty-Imposed-taxscan.jpg "Dual Custodianship on same good Cannot be Granted: CESTAT Sets Aside penalty Imposed under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Lack of Evidence and Section 11A(4) Misuse: CESTAT quashes ₹2.81 Cr Rule 6(3) Demand over Alleged Common Input Service Usage [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) struck down a demand of ₹2.81 Crore against the appellant ruling that the show cause notice ( SCN ) and the order...
![Lack of Evidence and Section 11A(4) Misuse: CESTAT quashes ₹2.81 Cr Rule 6(3) Demand over Alleged Common Input Service Usage [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Lack-of-Evidence-Input-Service-Usage-Section-11A4-show-cause-notice-taxscan.jpg "Lack of Evidence and Section 11A(4) Misuse: CESTAT quashes ₹2.81 Cr Rule 6(3) Demand over Alleged Common Input Service Usage [Read Order]")
Inquiry Officer Fails to Supply Investigation Reports and Witness Statements, Violating CBLR 2018 Rights: CESTAT quashes Customs License Revocation Order [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the order revoking the customs broker license, citing the Inquiry Officer's failure to provide...
![Inquiry Officer Fails to Supply Investigation Reports and Witness Statements, Violating CBLR 2018 Rights: CESTAT quashes Customs License Revocation Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-New-Delhi-Customs-License-Revocation-Order-Violating-CBLR-Inquiry-Officer-Fails-taxscan.jpg "Inquiry Officer Fails to Supply Investigation Reports and Witness Statements, Violating CBLR 2018 Rights: CESTAT quashes Customs License Revocation Order [Read Order]")
'Without challenging the Excise refund order, the Refund cannot be recovered': CESTAT overturns Commissioner's decision [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that the excise refund cannot be recovered when the department has not challenged...
![Without challenging the Excise refund order, the Refund cannot be recovered: CESTAT overturns Commissioners decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Excise-refund-order-CESTAT-overturns-CESTAT-challenging-the-Excise-refund-order-refund-order-CESTAT-Chandigarh-taxscan.jpg "Without challenging the Excise refund order, the Refund cannot be recovered: CESTAT overturns Commissioners decision [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Penalties for Non-Payment of Service Tax, Citing Intent to Evade Taxes and Lack of Revenue Neutrality [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT )upheld penalties for non-payment of service tax, citing the assessee's intent to evade taxes and the lack of...
![CESTAT upholds Penalties for Non-Payment of Service Tax, Citing Intent to Evade Taxes and Lack of Revenue Neutrality [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-Allahabad-Service-Tax-Penalties-for-Non-Payment-of-Service-Tax-Lack-of-Revenue-Neutrality-Evade-Taxes-CESTAT-upholds-Penalties-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Penalties for Non-Payment of Service Tax, Citing Intent to Evade Taxes and Lack of Revenue Neutrality [Read Order]")
Cross-Examination Requests should not be Allowed without Substantive Reply on Merits to SCN: Madras HC to Customs Dept [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court observed that cross-examination requests should not be entertained unless there is a substantive reply on the merits to the Show Cause Notice (SCN). The...
![Cross-Examination Requests should not be Allowed without Substantive Reply on Merits to SCN: Madras HC to Customs Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Cross-Examination-Requests-Allowed-Substantive-Reply-Merits-SCN-Madras-HC-Customs-Dept-taxscan.jpg "Cross-Examination Requests should not be Allowed without Substantive Reply on Merits to SCN: Madras HC to Customs Dept [Read Order]")