How to Excel in Tax Litigation: Tips and Tricks from Leading Tax Reporting Platforms
Tax disputes and their litigation are difficult tasks for tax professionals to handle. Tax litigation encompasses different aspects to a dispute, from...
![Interest Expenditure allowable u/s 57(iii) against Interest Income if Direct Nexus Proved: ITAT Deletes ₹1.06 Cr Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/29/250x150_2122376-interest-expenditure-allowable-interest-income-direct-nexus-proved-taxscan.webp "Interest Expenditure allowable u/s 57(iii) against Interest Income if Direct Nexus Proved: ITAT Deletes ₹1.06 Cr Disallowance [Read Order]")
![Is Corporate Guarantee given by Parent Company for Subsidiaries a ‘Supply’ under GST? Bombay HC to hear ₹870 Cr Stake matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/21/250x150_2121204-is-corporate-guarantee-given-parent-company-subsidiaries-taxscan.webp "Is Corporate Guarantee given by Parent Company for Subsidiaries a ‘Supply’ under GST? Bombay HC to hear ₹870 Cr Stake matter [Read Order]")
![No Separate Rent provided by Co-tenants: ITAT Grants relief to Landlord based on Tenant’s Bank Records [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/250x150_2120903-no-separate-rent-provided-by-co-tenants-taxscan.webp "No Separate Rent provided by Co-tenants: ITAT Grants relief to Landlord based on Tenant’s Bank Records [Read Order]")
No Capital Gain Tax in JDA Execution Year without Consideration & with Limited Possession: ITAT [Read Order]
‘Where no consideration is received and possession is handed over only for limited purpose of development, no capital gains can be said to have accrued in the year of execution of the JDA’, held the...
![No Capital Gain Tax in JDA Execution Year without Consideration & with Limited Possession: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/500x300_2120761-no-capital-gain-tax-jda-execution-year-without-consideration-taxscan.webp "No Capital Gain Tax in JDA Execution Year without Consideration & with Limited Possession: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the penalty against Bajaj Housing Finance, holding that such a penalty will be invalid as the notice for the same did not specify a sub-clause...
![Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/16/500x300_2120026-itat-rules-favour-bajaj-housing-finance-ltd-taxscan.webp "Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]")
GST Order Passed on Same Day as Additional Reply filed Does Not Mean Order suffers from Irregularities: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court held that merely the GST ( goods and services tax ) order passed on the same day as additional reply filed does not mean it suffers from any irregularities...
![GST Order Passed on Same Day as Additional Reply filed Does Not Mean Order suffers from Irregularities: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/14/500x300_2119547-gst-order-passed-on-same-day-additional-reply-filed-taxscan.jfif "GST Order Passed on Same Day as Additional Reply filed Does Not Mean Order suffers from Irregularities: Madras HC [Read Order]")
S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted a massive addition of ₹198 crores made under Section 56(2)(viib) and held that the provisions aimed at taxing share premiums ...
![S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113435-itat-deletes-198-cr-addition-taxscan.webp "S.56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Shares issued to Non-Resident Holding Company: ITAT Deletes ₹198 Cr Addition [Read Order]")
Ex-Parte Order Served After Years: Madras HC Restores 2002 Sales Tax Appeal Citing Extraordinary Delay [Read Order]
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has restored a long pending sales tax appeal after finding that an ex-parte order, passed years earlier but communicated much later, with an unusually...
![Ex-Parte Order Served After Years: Madras HC Restores 2002 Sales Tax Appeal Citing Extraordinary Delay [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/500x300_2111376-ex-parte-order-served-after-years-madras-hc-restores-2002-sales-tax-appeal-citing-extraordinary-delay-taxscan.webp "Ex-Parte Order Served After Years: Madras HC Restores 2002 Sales Tax Appeal Citing Extraordinary Delay [Read Order]")
Commercial Chartering Services by Shipping Ministry liable to service tax on 1% commission, Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable: CESTAT
The Principal Bench ofCustoms, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, ruled that the Ministry of Shipping’s Chartering Wing provided taxable Business Support Services by...
GST Authorities investigated Service Tax under Guise of Scrutinizing TRAN-1: Calcutta HC Restrains Coercive Action [Read Order]
The Calcutta HighCourt restrained the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities from employing coercive measures after it was alleged that the authorities had examined matters pertaining to the...
![GST Authorities investigated Service Tax under Guise of Scrutinizing TRAN-1: Calcutta HC Restrains Coercive Action [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/500x300_2111656-gst-authorities-investigated-service-tax-under-guise-scrutinizing-tran1-calcutta-hc-restrains-coercive-action.webp "GST Authorities investigated Service Tax under Guise of Scrutinizing TRAN-1: Calcutta HC Restrains Coercive Action [Read Order]")