![Crocin Trademark Sale to UK Company Constitutes Export, Exempt from Sales Tax: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/500x300_2107922-bombay-hc-crocin-trademark-taxscan.webp "Crocin Trademark Sale to UK Company Constitutes Export, Exempt from Sales Tax: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Crocin Trademark Sale to UK Company Constitutes Export, Exempt from Sales Tax: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has addressed a sales tax reference concerning the 1996 sale of the 'Crocin' trademark by M/s. Duphar Interfran Ltd. to SKB ...
![Consideration for Permitting Right to Use of Brand Name/Trademark is ‘Royalty’ under India – Turkey Tax Treaty, Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Trademark-Royalty-India-Turkey-Tax-Treaty-Taxable-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Consideration for Permitting Right to Use of Brand Name/Trademark is ‘Royalty’ under India – Turkey Tax Treaty, Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Trademark Registered in Family Members’ Name, not a Ground to Deny SSI Exemption: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Trademark-Registered-Family-Members-Name-Deny-SSI-Exemption-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Trademark Registered in Family Members’ Name, not a Ground to Deny SSI Exemption: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Right to Use of Trademark under Trademark License Agreement is 'Deemed Sale' subject to VAT, No Service Tax Leviable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that service tax is not leviable on the right to use of trademark under the Trademark License Agreement as...
![Right to Use of Trademark under Trademark License Agreement is Deemed Sale subject to VAT, No Service Tax Leviable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/trademark-Trademark-License-Agreement-Deemed-sale-VAT-Service-Tax-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Right to Use of Trademark under Trademark License Agreement is Deemed Sale subject to VAT, No Service Tax Leviable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Trademark Registration Expenses to sell Products in Foreign Countries allowable as Business Expenditure: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench has held that trademark registration expenses to sell products in foreign countries are allowable as business expenditure. During the...
![Trademark Registration Expenses to sell Products in Foreign Countries allowable as Business Expenditure: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Trademark-Registration-Expenses-Products-Foreign-Countries-Business-Expenditure-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Trademark Registration Expenses to sell Products in Foreign Countries allowable as Business Expenditure: ITAT [Read Order]")
Royalty received by Marriott International from Indian Entities: ITAT directs AO to re-consider the Taxability [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) comprising Shri Prashant Maharishi, AM and Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, JM has has directed the Assessing Officer to re-consider the...
![Royalty received by Marriott International from Indian Entities: ITAT directs AO to re-consider the Taxability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Royalty-Marriott-International-Indian-Entities-ITAT-AO-Taxability-Taxscan.jpeg "Royalty received by Marriott International from Indian Entities: ITAT directs AO to re-consider the Taxability [Read Order]")
Institute of Chartered Tax Advisers of India Ltd cannot use 'ADIT' to Launch any Courses during the Pendency of Trademark Suit: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has restricted the Institute Of Chartered Tax Advisers of India from using the trademark “ADIT” while launching any new courses during the pendency of the trademark suit filed by...
Kerala High Court to hear rejection of name under LLP Act, as proposed name contains words already registered under Trademark Act [Read Petition]
The Kerala High Court will preside over the rejection of name under LLP Act, as the proposed name contains words already registered under the trademark Act. The Petitioner, Kunhi Muhammed...
18% GST on “Franchisee Fees” and “Royalty” received under Franchise Agreement for Right to use Trademark, Brand Name: AAR [Read Order]
The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that 18% GST on “Franchise Fees” and “Royalty” received under the franchise agreement for the right to use the trademark, brand name, and other...
![18% GST on “Franchisee Fees” and “Royalty” received under Franchise Agreement for Right to use Trademark, Brand Name: AAR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/GST-Franchisee-Fee-Royalty-franchise-agreement-trademark-brand-name-AAR-Taxscan.jpg "18% GST on “Franchisee Fees” and “Royalty” received under Franchise Agreement for Right to use Trademark, Brand Name: AAR [Read Order]")