![Trading Liabilities incurred with Corresponding Purchases cannot be the subject matter of Addition u/s 68: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Trading-Liabilities-incurred-Corresponding-Purchases-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Trading Liabilities incurred with Corresponding Purchases cannot be the subject matter of Addition u/s 68: ITAT [Read Order]")
Trading Liabilities incurred with Corresponding Purchases cannot be the subject matter of Addition u/s 68: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that trading liabilities incurred with corresponding purchases cannot be the...
![No Reassessment in absence of failure to fully & truly disclose all material facts: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/No-Reassessment-in-absence-of-failure-to-fully-truly-disclose-all-material-facts-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Reassessment in absence of failure to fully & truly disclose all material facts: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Details and Evidence to prove Identity & Creditworthiness of Share Subscribers submitted, Addition u/s 68 not permissible: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Evidence-prove-Identity-Creditworthiness-ITAT-TAXSACN.jpg "Details and Evidence to prove Identity & Creditworthiness of Share Subscribers submitted, Addition u/s 68 not permissible: ITAT [Read Order]")
![GST paid on Sale of byproduct of Coal and total purchase price collected as a middleman cannot be added u/s 68: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GST-Coal-middleman-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST paid on Sale of byproduct of Coal and total purchase price collected as a middleman cannot be added u/s 68: ITAT [Read Order]")
Foundation for Levy of Penalty is on Addition made of Concealment of Income, No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable in the Absence of Addition: ITAT [Read Order]
Foundation for levy of penalty is on addition made of concealment of income, the Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax...
![Foundation for Levy of Penalty is on Addition made of Concealment of Income, No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable in the Absence of Addition: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-Addition-Concealment-Income-Penalty-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Foundation for Levy of Penalty is on Addition made of Concealment of Income, No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable in the Absence of Addition: ITAT [Read Order]")
MAT Credit of Transferee Company can be carried forward and set off against Tax Liability of Amalgamated Company: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that MAT credit of the transferee company can be carried forward and set off against tax liability of the amalgamated company. ...
![MAT Credit of Transferee Company can be carried forward and set off against Tax Liability of Amalgamated Company: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/MAT-Credit-Transferee-Company-Tax-Liability-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "MAT Credit of Transferee Company can be carried forward and set off against Tax Liability of Amalgamated Company: ITAT [Read Order]")
Income to be assessed as per MOU for Sharing Profit and Loss of Business and not on TDS deducted in Name of Assessee under PAN Number: ITAT [Read Order]
Income to be assessed as per MOU for sharing profit and loss of business and not on TDS deducted in name of assessee under PAN Number, so was held by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata. ...
![Income to be assessed as per MOU for Sharing Profit and Loss of Business and not on TDS deducted in Name of Assessee under PAN Number: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Income-MOU-profit-and-loss-of-business-TDS-PAN-Number-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Income to be assessed as per MOU for Sharing Profit and Loss of Business and not on TDS deducted in Name of Assessee under PAN Number: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Addition as Registrar had charged Stamp Duty as per prevailing Market Value for Property [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench deleted the addition on the ground that the registrar had charged stamp duty as per prevailing market value for the property. The assessee,...
![ITAT deletes Addition as Registrar had charged Stamp Duty as per prevailing Market Value for Property [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ITAT-registrar-stamp-duty-market-value-for-the-property-taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Addition as Registrar had charged Stamp Duty as per prevailing Market Value for Property [Read Order]")
Rental Income in the Nature of Compensation for Alternate Accommodation from the developer is not Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has ruled that rent received for alternate accommodation is not eligible to tax and deleted the enhancement of assessment made by the revenue. The...
![Rental Income in the Nature of Compensation for Alternate Accommodation from the developer is not Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Rental-Income-Nature-of-Compensation-Alternate-Accommodation-developer-Taxable-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Rental Income in the Nature of Compensation for Alternate Accommodation from the developer is not Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]")
‘ IMD Bonds ’ can be treated as Securities and Therefore it does not fall within the Meaning of Any Some of Money: ITAT [Read Order]
A division bench of Mumbai ITAT including Judicial Member C.N. Prasad and Accountant Member Rajesh Kumar, recently held that ‘ IMD Bonds ’ can be treated as Securities and therefore it does not fall...
![‘ IMD Bonds ’ can be treated as Securities and Therefore it does not fall within the Meaning of Any Some of Money: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Bonds-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "‘ IMD Bonds ’ can be treated as Securities and Therefore it does not fall within the Meaning of Any Some of Money: ITAT [Read Order]")
Income Assessed in Subsequent Year doesn’t cause loss to Revenue when Tax Rates are Same: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Mumbai in Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu held that when the Tax Rates applicable in both the years is same there is no...
![Income Assessed in Subsequent Year doesn’t cause loss to Revenue when Tax Rates are Same: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Tax-Rates-Taxscan.jpg "Income Assessed in Subsequent Year doesn’t cause loss to Revenue when Tax Rates are Same: ITAT [Read Order]")