Claim After 738 Days Of Delay and Post Approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT Upholds Rejection of Claim by Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Principal ( NCLAT ) upheld the order of the National Company Law Tribunal( NCLT )...
![Transport Service Cannot be Considered as GTA Service in Absence of Consignment Note: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-Delhi-GTA-Service-CESTAT-ruling-on-GTA-services-GST-implications-for-GTA-services-Goods-Transport-Agency-Taxscan.jpg "Transport Service Cannot be Considered as GTA Service in Absence of Consignment Note: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Customs Duty on Goods which was not Received: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-Duty-on-Goods-Customs-Duty-Legal-decision-on-unreceived-goods-Taxscan.jpeg "No Customs Duty on Goods which was not Received: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Actual Service of Notice of Hearing by Commissioner ( Appeals ): CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-Chandigarh-Service-Tax-Demand-Lack-of-notice-service-CESTAT-ruling-Notice-of-hearing-service-tax-appeal-Taxscan.jpg "No Actual Service of Notice of Hearing by Commissioner ( Appeals ): CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Adjudicating Authority is not Expert: CESTAT quashes Customs Duty Demand on 32mm TMT Bars [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) quashed customs duty demand on 32mm TMT bars and observed that the Adjudicating Authority is not an expert. ...
![Adjudicating Authority is not Expert: CESTAT quashes Customs Duty Demand on 32mm TMT Bars [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-duty-demand-TMT-bars-Adjudicating-Authority-32mm-steel-bars-taxscan.jpg "Adjudicating Authority is not Expert: CESTAT quashes Customs Duty Demand on 32mm TMT Bars [Read Order]")
SCN issued beyond Period of Limitation u/s 73 of Finance Act: Delhi HC allows Withdrawal of Petition [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawal of petition as the show cause notice was issued beyond the period of limitation under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1944. The petitioner impugned the...
![SCN issued beyond Period of Limitation u/s 73 of Finance Act: Delhi HC allows Withdrawal of Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Delhi-high-court-Show-cause-notice-SCN-Finance-act-Withdrawal-of-petition-TAXSCAN.jpg "SCN issued beyond Period of Limitation u/s 73 of Finance Act: Delhi HC allows Withdrawal of Petition [Read Order]")
Claim of CENVAT Credit related to Deemed Export: SC Lists EI Dupont Case for Hearing on February 29 [Read Order]
Supreme Court has posted the case for hearing on 29, February 2024 E I Dupont’s CENVAT Credit Claims Case related to deemed exports.  The assessee, M/s. EI Dupont India Pvt. Ltd. had resubmitted...
Ex-Promoter who Resigned before Commencement of CIRP is eligible to Submit Resolution Plan: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) observed that the ex-promoter who resigned before commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is...
Compliance with the conditions outlined in Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 2006 required for claiming reimbursement of expenses as CHA agent: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of (CESTAT) Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that in order to receive reimbursement on expenses incurred as Customs House Agent, the nomenclature used by...
![Compliance with the conditions outlined in Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 2006 required for claiming reimbursement of expenses as CHA agent: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/cestat-chennai-Service-Tax-Rules-2006-Rule-52-Compliance-CHA-Agent-Expense-Reimbursement-taxscan.jpg "Compliance with the conditions outlined in Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 2006 required for claiming reimbursement of expenses as CHA agent: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief to Blackberry: Supreme Court Upholds Rs. 8.55 Cr Excise Duty Refund along with Interest u/s 11BB [Read Order]
A two judge bench of the Supreme Court has upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) order in a case involving Blackberry India Pvt. Ltd. The bench held that interest...
![Relief to Blackberry: Supreme Court Upholds Rs. 8.55 Cr Excise Duty Refund along with Interest u/s 11BB [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Supreme-Court-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Refund-Blackberry-Supreme-Court-ruling-Excise-duty-refund-with-interest-Blackberry-India-legal-update-Blackberry-India-Refund-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Blackberry: Supreme Court Upholds Rs. 8.55 Cr Excise Duty Refund along with Interest u/s 11BB [Read Order]")