![Royalty not includable in Transaction Value of Imported Raw Materials to demand Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CESTAT-Customs-excise-service-tax-Raw-Materials-Value-of-raw-materials-TAXSCAN.jpg "Royalty not includable in Transaction Value of Imported Raw Materials to demand Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Royalty not includable in Transaction Value of Imported Raw Materials to demand Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that royalty not includable in transaction value of...
![Anti-Dumping Duty Leviable on Green Reflective Glass during Period 4th Jan 2009 to 22nd May 2009: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Anti-Dumping-Duty-CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Green-Reflective-Glass-Reflective-Glass-Anti-Dumping-Duty-taxscan.jpg "Anti-Dumping Duty Leviable on Green Reflective Glass during Period 4th Jan 2009 to 22nd May 2009: CESTAT [Read Order]")
GST Authorities not estopped from taking action against Wrongful Claim of ITC Based on Non-Existent Firms: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has held that the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) authorities are not estopped from taking action against the wrongful claim of Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) merely because the...
![GST Authorities not estopped from taking action against Wrongful Claim of ITC Based on Non-Existent Firms: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Wrongful-Claim-of-ITC-ITC-Claim-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "GST Authorities not estopped from taking action against Wrongful Claim of ITC Based on Non-Existent Firms: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
RP Failed to Examine issue of Reconstitution of CoC: NCLAT directs NCLT to decide after Considering Reply [Raed Order]
In a recent case, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) directed the National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) to decide after considering the reply since the Resolution Professional (...
NCLT convicts Port Authority Officers for Contempt of Court on disobeying directions by Adjudicating Authority [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) convicted the Port Authority Officers for contempt of court on disobeying directions by the Adjudicating Authority. Aggrieved with...
Unjust Enrichment in relation to refunds claimed pursuant to finalization of Provisional Assessments: CESTAT upholds order of Commissioner (Appeals) [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) observed that the respondent passed the Unjust Enrichment in relation to the refunds claimed...
![Unjust Enrichment in relation to refunds claimed pursuant to finalization of Provisional Assessments: CESTAT upholds order of Commissioner (Appeals) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Bangalore-Refund-Provisional-Assessments-Provisional-Assessments-Refunds-taxscan.jpg "Unjust Enrichment in relation to refunds claimed pursuant to finalization of Provisional Assessments: CESTAT upholds order of Commissioner (Appeals) [Read Order]")
NCLAT imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Costs on Creditor under Contempt of Courts Act invoking Doctrine of 'Approbate & Reprobate'
The New Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) imposed Rs. 1 Lakh costs on the Creditor under Contempt of Court Act, 1971 invoking the doctrine of 'approbate &...
Provisions of Section 11B of Central Excise Act not Applicable for Pre-Deposit made u/s 35F: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable for pre-deposit made under...
![Provisions of Section 11B of Central Excise Act not Applicable for Pre-Deposit made u/s 35F: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Chennai-Excise-act-Central-Excise-news-Section-11B-Central-Excise-Act-taxscan.jpg "Provisions of Section 11B of Central Excise Act not Applicable for Pre-Deposit made u/s 35F: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Service Tax Demand under Work Contract Service is not Valid as assessee was not Registered for the same: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that service tax demand under work contract service is not valid as the assessee was not...
![Service Tax Demand under Work Contract Service is not Valid as assessee was not Registered for the same: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Work-Contract-Service-CESTAT-Allahabad-Tax-news-Service-Tax-Demand-under-Work-Contract-Service-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand under Work Contract Service is not Valid as assessee was not Registered for the same: CESTAT [Read Order]")