![CESTAT initiates ‘Contempt of Court’ Proceedings against Asst Commissioner for Issuing Notice despite Tribunal Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/CESTAT-Contempt-of-Court-Asst-Commissioner-Notices-Tribunal-Order-Taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT initiates ‘Contempt of Court’ Proceedings against Asst Commissioner for Issuing Notice despite Tribunal Order [Read Order]")
CESTAT initiates ‘Contempt of Court’ Proceedings against Asst Commissioner for Issuing Notice despite Tribunal Order [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has referred a matter to the High Court for initiating ‘Contempt...
![Extended Limitation claimed by Department is not valid in absence of Suppression of Fact by Duty payer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Extended-Limitation-department-duty-payer-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Extended Limitation claimed by Department is not valid in absence of Suppression of Fact by Duty payer: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Filing of Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: IBBI asks to Furnish Extracts Of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B & E-Way Bills along with Application [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/GST-Returns-Corporate-Insolvency-Resolution-Process-IBBI-Furnish-GSTR-1-GSTR-3B-E-Way-Bills-Taxscan.jpeg "Filing of Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: IBBI asks to Furnish Extracts Of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B & E-Way Bills along with Application [Read Notification]")
![Improper Procedure adopted by Manufacturer cannot be treated as ‘Illegal’: CESTAT allows Excise Duty Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Manufacturer-Illegal-CESTAT-Excise-Duty-Refund-Taxscan.jpg "Improper Procedure adopted by Manufacturer cannot be treated as ‘Illegal’: CESTAT allows Excise Duty Refund [Read Order]")
Attempt to Smuggle Prohibited Goods cannot be Brushed aside as mere Violation of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) presided by Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) has held that an attempt to smuggle prohibited goods cannot...
![Attempt to Smuggle Prohibited Goods cannot be Brushed aside as mere Violation of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Prohibited-Goods-CBLR-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Attempt to Smuggle Prohibited Goods cannot be Brushed aside as mere Violation of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Interest on Pre-Deposit not available If Refund of Pre-Deposit sanctioned within Three Months: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad bench has ruled that the interest on pre-deposit under the Central Excise Act, 1944 is available if the refund is sanctioned...
![Interest on Pre-Deposit not available If Refund of Pre-Deposit sanctioned within Three Months: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Interest-Refund-Pre-Deposit-sanctioned-Three-Months-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Interest on Pre-Deposit not available If Refund of Pre-Deposit sanctioned within Three Months: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CBIC Circular clarifying Pre-SCN Consultation Norms on Service Tax has no Retrospective Effect: Gauhati HC [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court has held that a circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the rules for pre-show cause notice consultation which only clarifies the...
![CBIC Circular clarifying Pre-SCN Consultation Norms on Service Tax has no Retrospective Effect: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CBIC-Pre-SCN-Service-Tax-has-Gauhati-HC-taxscan.jpg "CBIC Circular clarifying Pre-SCN Consultation Norms on Service Tax has no Retrospective Effect: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
NCLAT sets aside Order Admitting Application filed under Section 7 without fulfilling the Threshold of 1 cr [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has set asides the order admitting application filed under Section 7 without fulfilling the threshold of 1Cr The respondent Narayan...
![NCLAT sets aside Order Admitting Application filed under Section 7 without fulfilling the Threshold of 1 cr [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NCLAT-Order-Application-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT sets aside Order Admitting Application filed under Section 7 without fulfilling the Threshold of 1 cr [Read Order]")
Customer Care Service is classifiable under 'Business Auxiliary Services' u/s 65 (11) of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that customer care service is classifiable under “Business Auxiliary Services” u/s 65(11) of Finance Act...
![Customer Care Service is classifiable under Business Auxiliary Services u/s 65 (11) of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Customer-care-service-Business-Auxiliary-Service-Finance-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Customer Care Service is classifiable under Business Auxiliary Services u/s 65 (11) of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Salary incrementation is valid by an Employment Agreement or Board Resolution, No claims sustain under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that salary incrementation is valid only by an employment agreement or board resolution, no claims sustained under...
![Salary incrementation is valid by an Employment Agreement or Board Resolution, No claims sustain under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Salary-incrementation-employment-agreement-Board-Resolution-IBC-NCLAT-Taxscan.jpg "Salary incrementation is valid by an Employment Agreement or Board Resolution, No claims sustain under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
