![CESTAT deletes Penalty against IVRCL in absence of allegation of Fraud, Mis-representation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CESTAT-penalty-IVRCL-fraud-mis-representation-Taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT deletes Penalty against IVRCL in absence of allegation of Fraud, Mis-representation [Read Order]")
CESTAT deletes Penalty against IVRCL in absence of allegation of Fraud, Mis-representation [Read Order]
The Customs, Excises, Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that there was no justification for the imposition of penalty, especially when...
![Supreme Court upholds validity of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020 mandating ‘minimum threshold’ on the home-buyers [Read judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Supreme-Court-Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Code-Amendment-Act-home-buyers-Taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court upholds validity of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020 mandating ‘minimum threshold’ on the home-buyers [Read judgment]")
![SEBI notifies SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SEBI-SEBI-Listing-Obligations-and-Disclosure-Requirements-Amendment-Regulations-Taxscan.jpeg "SEBI notifies SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 [Read Notification]")
GST: Adjudicating Authority has No Right to rectify an error after expiry of a period of more than 3 months, says Tripura High Court [Read Order]
The Tripura High Court held that the adjudicating authority has no right to rectify an error after the expiry of a period of more than three months. The petitioner, M/s Kiran Enterprise is the...
![GST: Adjudicating Authority has No Right to rectify an error after expiry of a period of more than 3 months, says Tripura High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/GST-Adjudicating-Authority-Tripura-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "GST: Adjudicating Authority has No Right to rectify an error after expiry of a period of more than 3 months, says Tripura High Court [Read Order]")
Objection of Audit can’t be the basis for determining Duty liability, in absence of any evidence to justify the Clandestine Manufacture/Clearances: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise, Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that objection of audit cannot be the basis for determining duty liability, in absence of any evidence to justify the clandestine...
![Objection of Audit can’t be the basis for determining Duty liability, in absence of any evidence to justify the Clandestine Manufacture/Clearances: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Objection-of-audit-duty-liability-evidence-clandestine-manufacture-clearances-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Objection of Audit can’t be the basis for determining Duty liability, in absence of any evidence to justify the Clandestine Manufacture/Clearances: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Existence of a predicate offence for initiation of proceedings under the PML Act is not a condition precedent to initiate proceedings: Karnataka High Court [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court held that the existence of a predicate offense for initiation of proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is not a condition precedent to initiate...
![Existence of a predicate offence for initiation of proceedings under the PML Act is not a condition precedent to initiate proceedings: Karnataka High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/predicate-offence-initiation-of-proceedings-PML-Act-initiate-proceedings-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Existence of a predicate offence for initiation of proceedings under the PML Act is not a condition precedent to initiate proceedings: Karnataka High Court [Read Order]")
Benefit of amendment regarding payment of balance consideration within 90 days to the highest bidder can’t be granted retrospectively: NCLT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) held that the benefit of the amendment under Clause 12 of Schedule-I of the Liquidation Regulation can not be granted retrospectively. The Applicant, Mr....
![Benefit of amendment regarding payment of balance consideration within 90 days to the highest bidder can’t be granted retrospectively: NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/amendment-balance-consideration-bidder-NCLT-Taxscan.jpg "Benefit of amendment regarding payment of balance consideration within 90 days to the highest bidder can’t be granted retrospectively: NCLT [Read Order]")
Procedure for E-Commerce Exports through Post doesn’t determine eligibility for Refund of ITC on Exports, not applicable retrospectively: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court while directing the matter back to the adjudicating authority held that the procedure for e-commerce exports through Post does not determine eligibility for refund of Input...
![Procedure for E-Commerce Exports through Post doesn’t determine eligibility for Refund of ITC on Exports, not applicable retrospectively: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/E-Commerce-Exports-Refund-of-ITC-Exports-Delhi-High-court-Taxscan.jpeg "Procedure for E-Commerce Exports through Post doesn’t determine eligibility for Refund of ITC on Exports, not applicable retrospectively: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![CBIC issues clarification on holding of Pre-Show Cause Notice Consultation [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/CBIC-Pre-Show-Cause-Notice-Consultation-Taxscan.jpg "CBIC issues clarification on holding of Pre-Show Cause Notice Consultation [Read Circular]")
Provisional Attachment Order ceases to have effect after 180 Days if no order has been passed: Delhi High Court quashes Authority’s Summons & Notices [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court while quashing the summons and notices issued by the Adjudicating Authority held that the Provisional Attachment Order ceases to have effect after 180 Days if no order under...
