Application u/s 9 of IBC must be Rejected on Establishment of Plausibility of Pre-Existing Dispute: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that once the plausibility of a pre-existing dispute is noticed, it is...
![Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Customs-Customs-Duty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-High-Court-Service-Tax-Madras-HC-service-tax-ruling-Contract-service-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]")
75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]
The Madras High Court granted an opportunity to explain the discrepancies between the form GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B as 75% disputed Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) has already been paid. Shri Yamuna, the...
![75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GSTR-GSTR-1-GSTR-3B-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]")
Petition u/s 7 of IBC Has to be Decide first When Both Arbitration & Insolvency Petitions are Pending: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that the petition under section 7 of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code ( IBC ),2016 has to be decided first when both...
Dissolution Of Corporate Debtor u/s 54 of IBC can be Sought after Complete Liquidation: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a significant case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that the scheme of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code ( IBC ), 2016 clearly provides that...
![Document Name being ‘Debit Note is no Reason to Deny CENVAT Credit to Vodafone: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Customs-Vodafone-CENVAT-Credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Document Name being ‘Debit Note is no Reason to Deny CENVAT Credit to Vodafone: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Adjudicating Authority have Inherent Power to Recall Its Judgement But Has No Power To Review: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) has held that adjudicating authority have inherent power to recall its judgement but has no power to review. The Tribunal clarified that the...
Customs Dept. claimed Imported Cashews as "Raw": CESTAT Remands Classification Dispute Citing Ambiguous Test Report [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) remanded a classification dispute, citing ambiguities in the test report used by the Customs Department to...
![Customs Dept. claimed Imported Cashews as Raw: CESTAT Remands Classification Dispute Citing Ambiguous Test Report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Hyderabad-Customs-Cashew-nuts-claims-under-custom-department-TAXSCAN.jpg "Customs Dept. claimed Imported Cashews as Raw: CESTAT Remands Classification Dispute Citing Ambiguous Test Report [Read Order]")