Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Relief to Kirloskar: Request for Reassessment be treated as Application under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 for amendment of Bill of Entry, rules CESTAT
The Customs, Excises, and Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench ruled that the request for reassessment be treated as...
![Budget 2021: Govt. suspends Anti-Dumping Duty on Imports of Steel Products from various nations including China [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Budget-2021-anti-dumping-duty-imports-of-steel-products-nations-China-Taxscan.jpeg "Budget 2021: Govt. suspends Anti-Dumping Duty on Imports of Steel Products from various nations including China [Read Notification]")
![Govt. extends Anti-Dumping Duty on Fluoroelastomers [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Anti-Dumping-Duty-Fluoroelastomers-Taxscan.jpg "Govt. extends Anti-Dumping Duty on Fluoroelastomers [Read Notification]")
![Fixing Anti-Dumping Duty using RLV Method Acceptable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Anti-Dumping-Duty-on-Steel-Products-TaxScan.jpg "Fixing Anti-Dumping Duty using RLV Method Acceptable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Order of Continuation of Anti-Dumping duty made After Expiry of Duty Period is Invalid: SC [Read Judgment]
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court held that the order of continuation of Anti-dumping duty, made after expiry of the duty period is invalid under the law. While confirming the High Court order,...
CESTAT can Examine the Correctness of Assertions made in the Final Finding issued by Designated Authority: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In Hindustan Liver Ltd v. Union of India, the Delhi High Court held that the CESTAT, under section 9 of the Customs Tariff Act, is empowered to examine the correctness of the assertions made in the...
“The Amount Paid as Anti-Dumping Duty would Form Part of Sale Price”: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]
The Division Bench of the Madras High Court, comprised of Justices V. Ramasubramanian and T. Mathivanan, recently opined in the case Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited v. State of Tamil...
