![Remand of Issue to AO for Re-adjudication by PCIT without Determining Profit Declared by Assessee is Erroneous: ITAT sets aside Revision Order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act [Supreme Court]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Remand-of-Issue-to-AO-for-Re-adjudication-PCIT-Determining-Profit-Declared-by-Assessee-Erroneous-ITAT-Income-tax-Income-tax-act-Revision-Order-under-section-263-of-income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Remand of Issue to AO for Re-adjudication by PCIT without Determining Profit Declared by Assessee is Erroneous: ITAT sets aside Revision Order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act [Supreme Court]")
Remand of Issue to AO for Re-adjudication by PCIT without Determining Profit Declared by Assessee is Erroneous: ITAT sets aside Revision Order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act [Supreme Court]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that that the PCIT has merely remitted the issue back to the file of the AO to redo the...
![AO has to form Opinion before Recording Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a) of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Disallowance-Delhi-high-court-Income-Tax-Act-Income-tax-Assessing-Officer-AO-has-to-form-Opinion-before-Recording-Disallowance-Under-section-40A2a.jpg "AO has to form Opinion before Recording Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a) of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Comparison with Fair Market value of Loan Interest not Made while Making Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a): ITAT Deletes Disallowance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Comparison-with-Fair-Market-value-of-Loan-Interest-Fair-Market-value-Loan-Interest-ITAT-Deletes-Disallowance-income-tax-act-income-tax-Disallowance-ITAT-Fair-Market-value-of-Loan-Interest.jpg "Comparison with Fair Market value of Loan Interest not Made while Making Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(a): ITAT Deletes Disallowance [Read Order]")
![Documentary Evidences Furnished by Assessee to Claim Loss Suffered not held to be Bogus/False by AO during Assessment or Penalty Proceedings : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Documentary-Evidences-Furnished-Assessee-Claim-Loss-Suffered-Bogus-False-AO-during-Assessment-Penalty-Proceedings-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Documentary Evidences Furnished by Assessee to Claim Loss Suffered not held to be Bogus/False by AO during Assessment or Penalty Proceedings : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Non-Consideration of Evidences Furnished to Prove Identity and Creditworthiness of Investors and Genuiness of Transaction: ITAT directs AO to Delete Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Additions-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-cant-be-Initiated-by-AO-without-Furnishing-Necessary-Evidences-AO-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Consideration of Evidences Furnished to Prove Identity and Creditworthiness of Investors and Genuiness of Transaction: ITAT directs AO to Delete Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
Action taken by AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless it is unsustainable in Law: ITAT quashes Revision Order for lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that if due to an erroneous order of the AO, the revenue is losing tax lawfully payable by a person, it will certainly be prejudicial...
![Action taken by AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless it is unsustainable in Law: ITAT quashes Revision Order for lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AO-Action-taken-by-AO-Action-taken-by-AO-cannot-be-treated-as-prejudicial-to-the-interest-of-revenue-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Action taken by AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue unless it is unsustainable in Law: ITAT quashes Revision Order for lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
ITAT directs AO to Share Information of Beneficiaries of Leading Kingpins Providing Bogus Long Term Capital Gains within 90 days [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to share information of beneficiaries of leading kingpins providing bogus long term capital gains...
![ITAT directs AO to Share Information of Beneficiaries of Leading Kingpins Providing Bogus Long Term Capital Gains within 90 days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ITAT-AO-ITAT-directs-AO-Information-Beneficiaries-Beneficiaries-of-Leading-Kingpins-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs AO to Share Information of Beneficiaries of Leading Kingpins Providing Bogus Long Term Capital Gains within 90 days [Read Order]")
2 days time to file Response to Income Tax Notice: Delhi HC quashes Notice u/s 148A(d) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed notice issued under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as there was only 2 days time to file response to the income tax notice. The record showed that the...
![2 days time to file Response to Income Tax Notice: Delhi HC quashes Notice u/s 148A(d) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Response-Income-Tax-Notice-Delhi-HC-time-to-file-Response-to-Income-Tax-Notice-taxscan.jpg "2 days time to file Response to Income Tax Notice: Delhi HC quashes Notice u/s 148A(d) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Relief to Jaquar: ITAT Restores Matter to AO for Examination of Quantum and Fulfillment of Stipulated Conditions u/s 80 JJAA of Income Tax Act for Claim of Deduction [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that deduction under Section 80JJAA of the Income Tax Act requires examination of quantum as well as fulfillment of various condition as...
![Relief to Jaquar: ITAT Restores Matter to AO for Examination of Quantum and Fulfillment of Stipulated Conditions u/s 80 JJAA of Income Tax Act for Claim of Deduction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-effective-Representation-Authorities-No-effective-Representation-before-lower-Authorities-ITAT-taxscan-1.jpg "Relief to Jaquar: ITAT Restores Matter to AO for Examination of Quantum and Fulfillment of Stipulated Conditions u/s 80 JJAA of Income Tax Act for Claim of Deduction [Read Order]")
No disallowance shall be made towards processed payment of employee's contribution to EPF within expiry of time limit: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench held that no disallowance should be made towards the process of payment of employee’s contribution to Employee Provident Fund (EPF) before expiry...
![No disallowance shall be made towards processed payment of employees contribution to EPF within expiry of time limit: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/disallowance-No-disallowance-payment-employees-contribution-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No disallowance shall be made towards processed payment of employees contribution to EPF within expiry of time limit: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 68 due to Non-Consideration of Unsigned Reply by Assessee to Notice issued u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed re-adjudication as the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 due to non-consideration of unsigned reply by...
![Addition u/s 68 due to Non-Consideration of Unsigned Reply by Assessee to Notice issued u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Addition-Non-Consideration-of-Unsigned-Reply-Reply-ITAT-taxscan-1.jpg "Addition u/s 68 due to Non-Consideration of Unsigned Reply by Assessee to Notice issued u/s 147 of Income Tax Act: ITAT directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty could be imposed under section 271(1)(c) as no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars was done...
![No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Concealment-of-Income-or-Furnishing-of-Inaccurate-Particulars-Income-Inaccurate-Particulars-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "No Concealment of Income or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")