![Bar under Section 10A IBC on initiation of CIRP applies retrospectively, Even if CIRP Application Filed Before introduction of Section 10A: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Bar-IBC-CIRP-CIRP-Application-Filed-Supreme-Court-Taxscan-1.jpg "Bar under Section 10A IBC on initiation of CIRP applies retrospectively, Even if CIRP Application Filed Before introduction of Section 10A: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
Bar under Section 10A IBC on initiation of CIRP applies retrospectively, Even if CIRP Application Filed Before introduction of Section 10A: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court held that Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) bars initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...
![Retrospective bar against initiation of CIRP applies to applications filed from 25 March 2020: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Retrospective-bar-CIRP-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Retrospective bar against initiation of CIRP applies to applications filed from 25 March 2020: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
![Supreme Court alters its Direction on Constitution of Search Cum Selection Committee regarding Appointment of Tribunal Members [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Supreme-Court-Constitution-of-Search-Cum-Selection-Committee-Appointment-of-Tribunal-Members-Taxscan.jpeg "Supreme Court alters its Direction on Constitution of Search Cum Selection Committee regarding Appointment of Tribunal Members [Read Order]")
![Relief to RayBan: ITAT deletes adjustments made by TPO on account of ALP of AMP expenses [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RayBan-ITAT-AMP-expenses-ALP-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to RayBan: ITAT deletes adjustments made by TPO on account of ALP of AMP expenses [Read Order]")
Supreme Court admits plea challenging Gujarat HC’s decision quashing IGST on Ocean Freights under Reverse Charge Mechanism [Read Order]
The Apex Court admitted the plea of the central government to challenge Gujarat High Court’s decision quashing Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) on ocean freights under reverse charge...
![Supreme Court admits plea challenging Gujarat HC’s decision quashing IGST on Ocean Freights under Reverse Charge Mechanism [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Supreme-Court-plea-challenging-Gujarat-High-Court-IGST-ocean-freights-reverse-charge-mechanism-Taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court admits plea challenging Gujarat HC’s decision quashing IGST on Ocean Freights under Reverse Charge Mechanism [Read Order]")
Filing of Charge Sheet by itself can't be a ground for Cancellation of Bail: Supreme Court denies relief to Tax Defaulter [Read Order]
The Supreme Court held that the filing of a charge sheet by itself cannot be a ground for cancellation of bail. The appellant, Kamlesh Chaudhary is accused of committing offences under Sections...
Supreme Court dismisses plea challenging Provisions of GST Act as constitutional challenge can be addressed before the High Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court dismissed the plea challenging the Provisions of CGST Act, 2017 as constitutional challenge can be addressed before the High Court. The petitioner, Devendra Divedi has filed the...
![Supreme Court dismisses plea challenging Provisions of GST Act as constitutional challenge can be addressed before the High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Supeme-Court-plea-challenging-Provisions-GST-Act-constitutional-challenge-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Supreme Court dismisses plea challenging Provisions of GST Act as constitutional challenge can be addressed before the High Court [Read Order]")
![GSTR-3B: Supreme Court stays Delhi HC Judgment granting relief to Bharti Airtel [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Supreme-Court-Delhi-High-Court-Judgment-Bharti-Airtel-Form-GSTR-3B-Taxscan.jpg "GSTR-3B: Supreme Court stays Delhi HC Judgment granting relief to Bharti Airtel [Read Order]")
![Order cannot be termed as “erroneous” unless it is not in accordance with Law: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Order-erroneous-law-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Order cannot be termed as “erroneous” unless it is not in accordance with Law: ITAT [Read Order]")
SC upholds Validity of Tribunal Rules 2020: Lawyers with 10 years Practice eligible for Appointment as Judicial Members
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience, and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 with some...
