![No Reasonable Cause for Delay in filing Appeal: ITAT Refuses to Condone Huge Delay of 3047 based on Vague Reasons [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Reasonable-Cause-filing-Appeal-Appeal-ITAT-Huge-Delay-Taxscan.jpg "No Reasonable Cause for Delay in filing Appeal: ITAT Refuses to Condone Huge Delay of 3047 based on Vague Reasons [Read Order]")
No Reasonable Cause for Delay in filing Appeal: ITAT Refuses to Condone Huge Delay of 3047 based on Vague Reasons [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has refused to condone the huge delay of 3047 days based on vague reasons and on the...
![Allahabad HC quashes Trade Tax Revision Petition as Decision on Second Appeal was Made on Ex parte basis [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Allahabad-High-Court-Trade-Tax-Revision-Petition-Appeal-Ex-parte-Taxscan.jpg "Allahabad HC quashes Trade Tax Revision Petition as Decision on Second Appeal was Made on Ex parte basis [Read Order]")
![Disposal of Appeal without attaining finality and allowing Reopening of all issues creates a Multiplicity of Proceedings: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Disposal-of-Appeal-Gujarat-Highcourt-taxscan.jpg "Disposal of Appeal without attaining finality and allowing Reopening of all issues creates a Multiplicity of Proceedings: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
![Huge Delay of 988 Days in filing Appeal cannot be condoned for Vague Reasons: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Appeal-Delay-Vague-Reasons-Reasons-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Huge Delay of 988 Days in filing Appeal cannot be condoned for Vague Reasons: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Demise of the counsel is not a valid reason for Condonation of Delay of 2569 days for Sales Tax Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Condonation-of-Delay-Sales-Tax-Tax-Appeal-Orissa-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Demise of the counsel is not a valid reason for Condonation of Delay of 2569 days for Sales Tax Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court (HC)held that the order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax Act, 1961 by Assessing Officer (AO) based on a wrong assumption is not valid when the assessee preferred for appeal. ...
![Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Assumption-AO-Order-Income-Tax-assessee-appeal-Orissa-High-Court-Assessing-Officer-Taxscan.jpg "Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
Remittance of 25% of Disputed Tax: Telangana HC notes further burden cannot be imposed during Pendency of Appeal [Read Order]
In a recent decision the Telangana High Court noted that further burden cannot be imposed during pendency of appeal on remittance of 25% of disputed tax. The petitioner, SAS Infra Projects India...
Non-Compliance of Notice and Non-Submission of Details: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 927 Days in filing of Appeal [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Kolkata Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, refused to condone the delay of 927 days in the filing of appeal, on the ground of non-...
![Non-Compliance of Notice and Non-Submission of Details: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 927 Days in filing of Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Condone-Delay-Notice-ITAT-Appeal-filing-of-Appeal-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Notice and Non-Submission of Details: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 927 Days in filing of Appeal [Read Order]")
“Preferring An Appeal does Not Mean Mere Formally Filing It But Also Taking All The Steps To Effectively Pursue The Appeal”: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently refused to condone the delay and remarked that “preferring an Appeal does not mean mere formally filing it but also taking all the...
![“Preferring An Appeal does Not Mean Mere Formally Filing It But Also Taking All The Steps To Effectively Pursue The Appeal”: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Appeal-Effectivel-Appeal-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "“Preferring An Appeal does Not Mean Mere Formally Filing It But Also Taking All The Steps To Effectively Pursue The Appeal”: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay [Read Order]")
Online Filing of Appeal by Foreign National Failed Due to Not Having Aadhaar: ITAT Grants Relief to Assessee [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Dehradun Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, granted relief to an assessee, in a case where the online filing of appeal by a foreign national...
![Online Filing of Appeal by Foreign National Failed Due to Not Having Aadhaar: ITAT Grants Relief to Assessee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Online-Filing-of-Appeal-Filing-of-Appeal-Appeal-Foreign-National-Aadhaar-ITAT-Assessee-Taxscan.jpg "Online Filing of Appeal by Foreign National Failed Due to Not Having Aadhaar: ITAT Grants Relief to Assessee [Read Order]")
Belated Filing of Appeal against Order of Demand of GST and Penalty: Calcutta HC allows Manual Filing [Read Order]
A Single Bench of the Calcutta High Court recently allowed the petitioner to manually file the appeal against the order of Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which could not be filed online within...
![Belated Filing of Appeal against Order of Demand of GST and Penalty: Calcutta HC allows Manual Filing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Filing-of-Appeal-Order-Order-of-Demand-GST-Penalty-Calcutta-High-Court-Manual-Filing-Taxscan.jpg "Belated Filing of Appeal against Order of Demand of GST and Penalty: Calcutta HC allows Manual Filing [Read Order]")
Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court in its recent judgement ordered to pay a mandatory pre-deposit under 35F of the Central Excise Act for the appeal hearing. Amar Enterprises, the Petitioner is registered...
![Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Jharkhand-High-Court-Orders-Pay-Mandatory-Pre-deposit-Pre-deposit-Central-Excise-Act-Appeal-Hearing-Taxscan.jpg "Jharkhand HC Orders to Pay Mandatory Pre-deposit under 35F of Central Excise Act for an Appeal Hearing [Read Order]")