![Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Crompton-Greaves-CESTAT-rules-Transformers-constitute-CESTAT-CCR-TAXSCAN.jpg "Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]")
Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]
In a setback to Crompton Greaves Ltd, the Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that the...
![Income Tax Act does not cast burden on deductee with regard to Deposit of Money, retained as Tax by Payer: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Income-Tax-Act-Deposit-of-Money-Delhi-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Act does not cast burden on deductee with regard to Deposit of Money, retained as Tax by Payer: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![No re-enhancement of value possible once value of goods was enhanced and paid Customs duty thereon: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CESTAT-customs-duty-re-enhancement-taxscan.jpg "No re-enhancement of value possible once value of goods was enhanced and paid Customs duty thereon: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Mild Steel Items used for manufacturing of Capital goods within factory premises are eligible for CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Mild-Steel-Items-Capital-goods-CENVAT-Credit-of-Excise-Duty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mild Steel Items used for manufacturing of Capital goods within factory premises are eligible for CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Job Work involving Conversion of Raw Materials Owned by other Registered Dealers attracts 12% GST: AAR [Read Order]
The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) observed that the job work involving conversion of raw materials owned by other registered dealers attracts 12% GST. The applicant, Shree Avani...
Expenditure pertaining to Consultancy fees can be treated as Revenue Expenditure are eligible for deduction u/s. 37(1) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the expenditure of consultancy fees can be treated as revenue expenditure and is eligible for the deduction under section 37 (1)...
![Expenditure pertaining to Consultancy fees can be treated as Revenue Expenditure are eligible for deduction u/s. 37(1) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Expenditure-pertaining-Consultancy-fees-Revenue-Expenditure-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Income-Appellate-taxscan-1.jpg "Expenditure pertaining to Consultancy fees can be treated as Revenue Expenditure are eligible for deduction u/s. 37(1) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty imposed for Abetting Clearance of Goods: CESTAT reduces Penalty as Main notice Settled Dispute under SVLDR Scheme [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) reduced the Penalty imposed for abetting clearance of goods as the main notice settled dispute under Sabha Vishwas...
![Penalty imposed for Abetting Clearance of Goods: CESTAT reduces Penalty as Main notice Settled Dispute under SVLDR Scheme [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/SVLDR-Scheme-CESTAT-Chennai-bench-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Penalty imposed for Abetting Clearance of Goods: CESTAT reduces Penalty as Main notice Settled Dispute under SVLDR Scheme [Read Order]")
Delhi HC upholds Income Tax Addition to Declared Income on Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court upheld the income tax addition to declared income on money received under Marketing Assistance Programme (MPA). The record showed that the Assessing Officer (AO) had made the...
![Delhi HC upholds Income Tax Addition to Declared Income on Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Delhi-HC-Income-Tax-Declared-Income-Money-received-Marketing-Assistance-Programme-TAXSCAN.webp "Delhi HC upholds Income Tax Addition to Declared Income on Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [Read Order]")
Procuring Sales Orders for Products Manufactured by Steel Mills outside India for Customers in India is Export of Service: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand and ruled that procuring sales orders for products manufactured by steel mills outside...
![Procuring Sales Orders for Products Manufactured by Steel Mills outside India for Customers in India is Export of Service: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Procuring-Sales-Products-Manufactured-Steel-Mills-India-Customers-India-Export-Service-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-TAXSCANA.jpg "Procuring Sales Orders for Products Manufactured by Steel Mills outside India for Customers in India is Export of Service: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Subsequent Service of Order Copy is Date of Communication of Order-in-Original: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand and observed that the subsequent service of order copy is date of communication of...
![Subsequent Service of Order Copy is Date of Communication of Order-in-Original: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Subsequent-Service-Order-Copy-Date-Communication-Order-in-Original-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg "Subsequent Service of Order Copy is Date of Communication of Order-in-Original: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Relief to Oriental Structural Engineers: SC upholds Arbitration Tribunal’s Award to Refund or Deduct Overpaid Tax [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court bench of Justice M.M. Sundaresh and Justice J.B. Pardiwala presiding, provided relief to Oriental Structural Engineers by endorsing the Arbitration Tribunal's ruling to either...
