Low Aromatic White Spirit is Classifiable under Light Oil and Preparations: CESTAT Confirms Setting Aside Confiscation
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), confirmed setting aside of confiscation and held that low...
![Delay in Considering Statutory Appeal by CIT(A): Chhattisgarh HC Directs to Decide Appeal within 90 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Delay-in-Considering-Statutory-Appeal-Statutory-Appeal-Chhatisgarh-High-Court-Appeal-within-90-Days-taxscan.jpg "Delay in Considering Statutory Appeal by CIT(A): Chhattisgarh HC Directs to Decide Appeal within 90 Days [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC upholds Penalty Imposed on Overseas Entity Seville Products Limited for Customs Duty Evasion [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Delhi-HC-upholds-Penalty-Imposed-Overseas-Entity-Seville-Products-Limited-for-Customs-Duty-Evasion-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delhi HC upholds Penalty Imposed on Overseas Entity Seville Products Limited for Customs Duty Evasion [Read Order]")
![ITAT Allows Interest on Refund u/s 244A of Finance Act, 2016: A Matter of Fairness and Equity [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Allows-Interest-on-Refund-Interest-on-Refund-Interest-Refund-Finance-Act-Equity-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Allows Interest on Refund u/s 244A of Finance Act, 2016: A Matter of Fairness and Equity [Read Order]")
No Prejudice to Taxpayer on Non-Formation of GSTAT: Calcutta HC stays Recovery Proceedings [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court stayed the recovery proceedings as no prejudice to the taxpayer was caused by non-formation of the Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT). The intra-court appeal...
![No Prejudice to Taxpayer on Non-Formation of GSTAT: Calcutta HC stays Recovery Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/No-Prejudice-to-Taxpayer-on-Non-Formation-of-GSTAT-Calcutta-High-Court-stays-Recovery-Proceedings-Taxpayer-GSTAT-GST-Calcutta-High-Court-Recovery-Proceedings-Taxscan.jpg "No Prejudice to Taxpayer on Non-Formation of GSTAT: Calcutta HC stays Recovery Proceedings [Read Order]")
GST Dept Cannot Ignore the Refund allowed on Zero Rated Supply because of Appeal to be Filed: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that the Goods and Service Tax (GST) department cannot ignore the refund allowed on zero-rated supply because of an appeal to be filed against the said order. M/s...
![GST Dept Cannot Ignore the Refund allowed on Zero Rated Supply because of Appeal to be Filed: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GST-Dept-Cannot-Ignore-the-Refund-GST-department-GST-Refund-Zero-Rated-Supply-Appeal-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "GST Dept Cannot Ignore the Refund allowed on Zero Rated Supply because of Appeal to be Filed: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal: Orissa HC stays Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Non-Constitution-of-GST-Appellate-Tribunal-Non-Constitution-GST-Appellate-Tribunal-Orissa-HC-stays-Tax-Demand-Tax-Demand-Orissa-High-Court-GST-taxscan.jpg "Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal: Orissa HC stays Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Allahabad HC upholds Tax Penalty u/s 74 UPGST Act imposed on Resort Owner based on Corroborative Evidence [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court upheld the tax penalty under Section 74 Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act (UPGST Act) imposed on Resort Owner based on Corroborative Evidence. The appeal was filed...
![Allahabad HC upholds Tax Penalty u/s 74 UPGST Act imposed on Resort Owner based on Corroborative Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Allahabad-Highcourt-upholds-Tax-Penalty-UPGST-Act-Resort-Owner-Corroborative-Evidence-Allahabad-Highcourt-taxscan.jpeg "Allahabad HC upholds Tax Penalty u/s 74 UPGST Act imposed on Resort Owner based on Corroborative Evidence [Read Order]")
Presumption u/s 24 of PML Act can be Rebutted only at Stage of Trial: Jharkhand HC Upholds Rejection of Discharge Petition [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court held that presumption under section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PML Act) can be rebutted only at the stage of trial and upheld the rejection of the...
![Presumption u/s 24 of PML Act can be Rebutted only at Stage of Trial: Jharkhand HC Upholds Rejection of Discharge Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/PML-Act-Stage-of-Trial-PML-Act-can-be-Rebutted-only-at-Stage-of-Trial-Jharkhand-High-Court-Jharkhand-High-Court-Upholds-Rejection-of-Discharge-Petition-Rejection-of-Discharge-Petition-Taxscan.jpg "Presumption u/s 24 of PML Act can be Rebutted only at Stage of Trial: Jharkhand HC Upholds Rejection of Discharge Petition [Read Order]")
![Cum Duty Benefit allowable when Excise Duty is not Collected Separately: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Cum-Duty-Excise-Duty-CESTAT-Customs-Taxscan.jpg "Cum Duty Benefit allowable when Excise Duty is not Collected Separately: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Application Filed for Refund of Excess Payment cannot be treated as non-est if it is not Deficient in Material Particulars: Delhi HC sets aside Order
In a significant case, the Delhi High Court held that an application filed for refund of excess payment could not be treated as non-est if it was not deficient in material particulars and set aside...
