![Infringements Allegedly Occurred in Delhi, Not WB: Calcutta HC Dismisses Kuwait Based Company’s Challenge to DGTR ADD Findings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/24/500x300_2114473-infringements-allegedly-occured-delhic-wb-calcutta-hc-dismisses-kuwait-based-company-challenge-dgtr-add-findings-taxscan.webp "Infringements Allegedly Occurred in Delhi, Not WB: Calcutta HC Dismisses Kuwait Based Company’s Challenge to DGTR ADD Findings [Read Order]")
Infringements Allegedly Occurred in Delhi, Not WB: Calcutta HC Dismisses Kuwait Based Company’s Challenge to DGTR ADD Findings [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by Kuwait based company challenging the final findings of the Directorate General of...
![Lawyer’s Office in Residential Basement not a ‘Commercial Activity’: Delhi HC quashes NDMC proceedings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/250x150_2097382-lawyers-office-residential-basement-taxscan.webp "Lawyer’s Office in Residential Basement not a ‘Commercial Activity’: Delhi HC quashes NDMC proceedings [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC upholds Higher Property Tax on Luxury Hotels holding Star Ratings Valid Basis for Classification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/17/250x150_2088107-luxury-hotels-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC upholds Higher Property Tax on Luxury Hotels holding Star Ratings Valid Basis for Classification [Read Order]")
![SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/250x150_2085862-scn-appeals-and-non-finalised-orders-gst-rules-taxscan.webp "SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![GST S. 16(2)(c) and Rule 36(4) Not Violative of Article 14: Madras HC dismisses writ petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/14/250x150_2076629-gst-rule.webp "GST S. 16(2)(c) and Rule 36(4) Not Violative of Article 14: Madras HC dismisses writ petition [Read Order]")
Madras HC Upholds Validity of GST Rule 36(4), Declares It Neither Ultra Vires Nor Violative of Article 14 [Read Order]
The Madras High Court dismissed a constitutional challenge against Rule 36(4) of the Central and Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax ( CGST ) Rules, 2017, confirming its validity and holding that the...
![Madras HC Upholds Validity of GST Rule 36(4), Declares It Neither Ultra Vires Nor Violative of Article 14 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Madras-HC-Validity-of-GST-Rule-364-Neither-Ultra-Vires-Violative-of-Article-14-TAXSCAN.jpg "Madras HC Upholds Validity of GST Rule 36(4), Declares It Neither Ultra Vires Nor Violative of Article 14 [Read Order]")
Capital Gain arising out of Transfer of shares of an Indian entity cannot be Taxed at Hands of Foreign Entity in India: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that capital gain arising out of transfer of shares of an Indian entity cannot be taxed at hands of foreign entity in India...
![Capital Gain arising out of Transfer of shares of an Indian entity cannot be Taxed at Hands of Foreign Entity in India: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Capital-Gain-Indian-entity-Foreign-Entity-out-of-Transfer-ITAT-NEWS-TAXSCAN.jpg "Capital Gain arising out of Transfer of shares of an Indian entity cannot be Taxed at Hands of Foreign Entity in India: ITAT [Read Order]")
Unconstitutional for Unequal Treatment of Equals: Karnataka HC strikes down EPF Scheme Extension to International Workers [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court has invalidated the Central Government decision to extend the Employees Provident Fund Scheme and Employees Pension Scheme to international workers in India. The Single...
Period of Limitation for cases covered u/s 49(a) of Stamp Act is Six Months from Date on which Stamp Paper was Spoiled: Delhi HC directs to Refund 90% of Stamp Duty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court directed to refund 90% of stamp duty and observed that period of limitation for cases covered under Section 49(a) of the Stamp Act, 1899 is six months from date on which stamp...
