![Commissioner (Appeals) cannot Condone Delay for more than one month for Service Tax Appeals: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Commissioner-Appeals-Condone-Delay-Service-Tax-Appeals-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg "Commissioner (Appeals) cannot Condone Delay for more than one month for Service Tax Appeals: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Commissioner (Appeals) cannot Condone Delay for more than one month for Service Tax Appeals: Kerala HC [Read Order]
In a significant ruling the Kerala High Court observed that the Commissioner cannot condone delay for more than one month for service tax appeals. ...
![No penalty or interest leviable on filing income tax return on time: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/No-penalty-interest-leviable-filing-income-tax-return-on-time-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg "No penalty or interest leviable on filing income tax return on time: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
![Order passed by Adjudicating Authority can be appealed before Appellate Tribunal u/s 26 of PMLA: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Order-passed-Adjudicating-Authority-appealed-Appellate-Tribunal-PMLA-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Order passed by Adjudicating Authority can be appealed before Appellate Tribunal u/s 26 of PMLA: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Challenge of Assessment Order and Stay Petition: Kerala HC directs Income Tax Commissioner to decide Stay Petition Expeditiously [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Challenge-of-Assessment-Order-Stay-Petition-Kerala-HC-Income-Tax-Commissioner-Stay-Petition-Expeditiously-TAXSCAN.jpg "Challenge of Assessment Order and Stay Petition: Kerala HC directs Income Tax Commissioner to decide Stay Petition Expeditiously [Read Order]")
Bombay High Court strikes down Customs Circular Limiting Shipping Bill Amendments citing Violation of section 149 of Customs Act [Read Order]
The High Court of Bombay has struck down Para 3(a) of Customs Circular No. 36/2010, which imposed time limits for amending shipping bills, citing a violation of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. ...
![Bombay High Court strikes down Customs Circular Limiting Shipping Bill Amendments citing Violation of section 149 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Bombay-High-Court-strikes-down-Customs-Circular-Bombay-High-Court-Customs-Circular-Shipping-Bill-Amendments-Amendments-Customs-Act-taxscan.jpg "Bombay High Court strikes down Customs Circular Limiting Shipping Bill Amendments citing Violation of section 149 of Customs Act [Read Order]")
Madras High Court Directs Customs Authorities to Expedite Provisional Release of Imported Goods u/s 110A of Customs Act Citing Prompt Reply & Evidence against SCN [Read Order]
The High Court of Madras has issued a significant order directing the customs authorities to expedite the provisional release of imported goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 citing the...
![Madras High Court Directs Customs Authorities to Expedite Provisional Release of Imported Goods u/s 110A of Customs Act Citing Prompt Reply & Evidence against SCN [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Madras-High-Court-Customs-Authorities-Customs-Provisional-Release-Imported-Goods-Customs-Act-Citing-Prompt-Evidence-against-SCN-Evidence-SCN-Taxscan.jpg "Madras High Court Directs Customs Authorities to Expedite Provisional Release of Imported Goods u/s 110A of Customs Act Citing Prompt Reply & Evidence against SCN [Read Order]")
Madras HC directs Income Tax Department to Refund Excessively Recovered Amount over and above 20% [Read Order]
The Madras High Court directed the Income Tax Department to refund excessively recovered amount over and above 20%. The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to...
![Madras HC directs Income Tax Department to Refund Excessively Recovered Amount over and above 20% [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-Income-Tax-Department-Refund-Excessively-Recovered-Amount.jpg "Madras HC directs Income Tax Department to Refund Excessively Recovered Amount over and above 20% [Read Order]")
"Assessee can't be Harassed for Change in System": Calcutta HC Slams Income Tax Dept for Not Knowing Appellate Authority under Faceless System [Read Order]
In a recent decision the Calcutta High Court slammed Income Tax Department for not knowing the Appellate Authority under the faceless system and noted that the "Assessee can't be Harassed for Change...
![Assessee cant be Harassed for Change in System: Calcutta HC Slams Income Tax Dept for Not Knowing Appellate Authority under Faceless System [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Assessee-cant-be-Harassed-for-Change-in-System-Calcutta-HC-Calcutta-High-Court-High-Court-Income-Tax-Dept-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Assessee cant be Harassed for Change in System: Calcutta HC Slams Income Tax Dept for Not Knowing Appellate Authority under Faceless System [Read Order]")
ATM Management Services Provided to Banks Not Liable to VAT as No Sale or Transfer of Ownership or Possession involved, only Service Tax Applies: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
The High Court of Karnataka has held that the Automated Teller Machine (ATM) Management Services provided by service provider companies to the banks are not liable to Value Added Tax (VAT) as there...
![ATM Management Services Provided to Banks Not Liable to VAT as No Sale or Transfer of Ownership or Possession involved, only Service Tax Applies: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ATM-Management-Services-ATM-Banks-Not-Liable-to-VAT-VAT-Transfer-of-Ownership-Possession-Service-Tax-Applies-Karnataka-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "ATM Management Services Provided to Banks Not Liable to VAT as No Sale or Transfer of Ownership or Possession involved, only Service Tax Applies: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
Remedy for Pre-Trial Arrest u/s 69 of CGST Act is to Invoke Writ Petition; not Anticipatory Bail: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
In a recent judgment, a Division Bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra of the Supreme Court ruled that for a person summoned under Section 69 of the Central Goods...
Madras HC Directs to Decide Maintainability of Statutory Appeal which Unable to Access Online Filing Portal Due to Technical Glitches [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court directed the adjudicating authority to decide the maintainability of a statutory appeal filed by the petitioner who was unable to access the online portal...
![Madras HC Directs to Decide Maintainability of Statutory Appeal which Unable to Access Online Filing Portal Due to Technical Glitches [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Madras-High-Court-Madras-High-Court-Directs-to-Decide-Maintainability-of-Statutory-Appeal-Statutory-Appeal-Online-Filing-Portal-Due-to-Technical-Glitches-Technical-Glitches-Taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Directs to Decide Maintainability of Statutory Appeal which Unable to Access Online Filing Portal Due to Technical Glitches [Read Order]")