Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Taxpayer Claims Income Declared in ITR Wrong & Belonged to Another Year: ITAT Remands Matter for Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/04/500x300_2123711-taxpayer-claims-income-declared-itr-wrong-belonged-another-year-itat-remands-matter-verification-taxscan-.webp "Taxpayer Claims Income Declared in ITR Wrong & Belonged to Another Year: ITAT Remands Matter for Verification [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Claims Income Declared in ITR Wrong & Belonged to Another Year: ITAT Remands Matter for Verification [Read Order]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, has remanded a matter back for verification since the taxpayer/assessee claims that income has ...
![Amounts Collected During Central Excise Investigation Must Be Refunded After Demand is Set Aside: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/02/250x150_2116750-amounts-collected-central-excise-investigation-refunded-demand-cestat-taxscan.webp "Amounts Collected During Central Excise Investigation Must Be Refunded After Demand is Set Aside: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/250x150_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Non-Disclosure of CESS in GSTR-3B Revenue Neutral, Dept Overlooked GSTR-9 Filing: Calcutta HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/02/250x150_2109513-non-disclosure-cess-gstr-3b-revenue-neutral-dept-gstr-9-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "Non-Disclosure of CESS in GSTR-3B Revenue Neutral, Dept Overlooked GSTR-9 Filing: Calcutta HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")
![Issuance of Penalty order without Adjudication violates Article 265 of Constitution: Karnataka HC Directs Refund for Vehicle Seizure [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/250x150_2109160-penalty-cestat-taxscan.webp "Issuance of Penalty order without Adjudication violates Article 265 of Constitution: Karnataka HC Directs Refund for Vehicle Seizure [Read Order]")
Hotel Property Lease Exempt from ‘Renting of Immovable Property’: CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax of ₹9.63L [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal of Valvan Village Resorts, quashing the service tax demand of ₹9,63,562 along with interest...
![Hotel Property Lease Exempt from ‘Renting of Immovable Property’: CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax of ₹9.63L [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/02/500x300_2083528-hotel-property-lease-hotel-property-renting-of-immovable-property-taxscan.webp "Hotel Property Lease Exempt from ‘Renting of Immovable Property’: CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax of ₹9.63L [Read Order]")
Claim of Breach under Article 265 cannot be from a interlocutory order by Assessing Officer: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court held that a claim of breach of Article 265 of the constitution cannot be alleged or sustained based upon a preliminary, prima facie, or interlocutory order and not a final...
![Claim of Breach under Article 265 cannot be from a interlocutory order by Assessing Officer: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/20/500x300_2050885-bombay-hc-forum-conveniens-doctrine-dismiss-trustcaps-income-tax-matter-cause-of-action-at-kolkata-taxscan.webp "Claim of Breach under Article 265 cannot be from a interlocutory order by Assessing Officer: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 16]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-2024-Annual-Digest-2024-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 16]")
Royalty imposed on Advertisement Hoardings by Municipal Corporations not Tax: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has held that the "royalty" charged by municipal corporations to advertising companies for installing hoardings and advertisements cannot be classified as a "tax." On August 29,...
