Training Expenses on Skill Development not to be disallowed Treating it as Deferred Expense: Delhi HC upholds ITAT's order
The Delhi High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) wherein it was held that training expenses on skill development...
![Depreciation on Software calculated at Rate of 25% Instead of 60%: Delhi HC upholds Deletion of Disallowance under Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Depreciation-on-Software-Delhi-HC-Deletion-of-Disallowance-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Depreciation on Software calculated at Rate of 25% Instead of 60%: Delhi HC upholds Deletion of Disallowance under Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC quashes Time Barred Notice Issued U/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Delhi-HC-Time-Barred-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delhi HC quashes Time Barred Notice Issued U/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC upholds Income Tax Addition to Declared Income on Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Delhi-HC-Income-Tax-Declared-Income-Money-received-Marketing-Assistance-Programme-TAXSCAN.webp "Delhi HC upholds Income Tax Addition to Declared Income on Money received under Marketing Assistance Programme [Read Order]")
Market Survey report Based on Contemporaneous Import Data is not Valid: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty under Customs Act for MisDeclaration [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT)has held that the market survey report based on contemporaneous import data is not valid and set aside the penalty...
![Market Survey report Based on Contemporaneous Import Data is not Valid: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty under Customs Act for MisDeclaration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Market-Survey-report-Contemporaneous-Import-Data-CESTAT-Sets-Aside-Penalty-Customs-Act-for-MisDeclaration-MisDeclaration-CESTAT-CESTAT-News-Excise-Customs-Service-Tax-Tax-News-TAXSCAN.jpg "Market Survey report Based on Contemporaneous Import Data is not Valid: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty under Customs Act for MisDeclaration [Read Order]")
No Addition can be made u/s 153A in absence of Incriminating Material found during course of Search conducted u/s 132 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh bench, held that no addition could be made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the absence of incriminating material found during...
![No Addition can be made u/s 153A in absence of Incriminating Material found during course of Search conducted u/s 132 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/No-Addition-Incriminating-Material-during-course-Search-conducted-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Addition can be made u/s 153A in absence of Incriminating Material found during course of Search conducted u/s 132 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Addition shall be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act when creditworthiness of Loan provider through Banking Channel satisfactorily explained: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Surat bench, held that an addition shall not be made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when the creditworthiness of the loan provider through the...
![No Addition shall be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act when creditworthiness of Loan provider through Banking Channel satisfactorily explained: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/addition-Income-Tax-Act-creditworthiness-of-loan-provider-banking-channel-satisfactorily-explained-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No Addition shall be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act when creditworthiness of Loan provider through Banking Channel satisfactorily explained: ITAT [Read Order]")
Every Loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of Assessing Officer cannot be treated as Prejudicial to Interest of Revenue: ITAT quashes Revision Order passed against Depreciation claimed on New Assets
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Surat bench, quashed the revision order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without following the natural justice principle in respect of...
Assessment Order under Income Tax Act passed before time to file Reply to SCN expired: Delhi HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed the assessment order passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the same was passed before time to file reply to the show cause notice (SCN) expired. The preliminary...
![Assessment Order under Income Tax Act passed before time to file Reply to SCN expired: Delhi HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Assessment-Order-Income-Tax-Act-SCN-Assessment-Order-under-Income-Tax-Act-passed-before-time-to-file-Reply-to-SCN-expired-taxscan.jpg "Assessment Order under Income Tax Act passed before time to file Reply to SCN expired: Delhi HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Non-Disclosure of Shareholding Structures as u/s 92E of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC upholds Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court upheld the penalty as there was non-disclosure of the shareholding structures as under Section 92E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The only issue which arose for consideration...
![Non-Disclosure of Shareholding Structures as u/s 92E of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Non-Disclosure-Shareholding-Structures-Delhi-High-Court-upholds-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Non-Disclosure of Shareholding Structures as u/s 92E of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
Failure to prove Statement and Certificate filed along with Form No.67Â u /r 128(8)(ii) IT Rules for claiming FTC in which Income received from Kazakhstan Employer: ITAT directs Re-Adjudication
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune bench, while directing readjudication in respect of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC), observed that the assessee had failed to prove the statement and...
