![Relief to S&P Global India: Payment for Use of Shrink Wrap Computer Software Not Royalty, Rules ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SP-Global-India-Payment-Shrink-Wrap-Computer-Software-Royalty-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to S&P Global India: Payment for Use of Shrink Wrap Computer Software Not Royalty, Rules ITAT [Read Order]")
Relief to S&P Global India: Payment for Use of Shrink Wrap Computer Software Not Royalty, Rules ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Hyderabad Bench has recently, in an appeal filed before it, while granting relief to S & P Global...
![Assessing Officer must not act Dishonestly or Vindictively: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Assessing-Officer-Dishonestly-Vindictively-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Assessing Officer must not act Dishonestly or Vindictively: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Rent from Sub-Letting Property Taxable as “Income from Other Sources”: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Rent-Sub-Letting-Property-Taxable-Income-from-Other-Sources-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Rent from Sub-Letting Property Taxable as “Income from Other Sources”: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC quashes Notice issued u/s 148 Without jurisdiction against Lakshdeep Investments & Finance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Bombay-HC-Noticet-jurisdiction-Lakshdweep-Investments-Finance-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bombay HC quashes Notice issued u/s 148 Without jurisdiction against Lakshdeep Investments & Finance [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Officer Issues SCN twice to Non-Existing Entity: Calcutta HC Impose Personal Cost of ₹20,000 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Income-Tax-Officer-Income-Tax-SCN-Non-Existing-Entity-Calcutta-High-Court-Personal-Cost-Cost-Taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Officer Issues SCN twice to Non-Existing Entity: Calcutta HC Impose Personal Cost of ₹20,000 [Read Order]")
Debits and Credits Can in no way Lead to Inference of Income Escaped Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]
In a recent decision the Bombay High Court observed that debits and credits can in no way lead to an inference of income escaped assessment. The petitioner, Digi1 Electronics Pvt Ltd, challenged...
![Debits and Credits Can in no way Lead to Inference of Income Escaped Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Debits-Credits-Income-Escaped-Assessment-Income-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Debits and Credits Can in no way Lead to Inference of Income Escaped Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Filing of Fresh ITR Not Necessary If Assessee feels that Earlier Return should be Considered for Re-Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that the filing of a fresh Income Tax Return was not necessary if the assessee felt that the earlier return should be considered for...
![Filing of Fresh ITR Not Necessary If Assessee feels that Earlier Return should be Considered for Re-Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ITR-Assessee-Return-Re-Assessment-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Filing of Fresh ITR Not Necessary If Assessee feels that Earlier Return should be Considered for Re-Assessment: ITAT [Read Order]")
Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court (HC)held that the order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax Act, 1961 by Assessing Officer (AO) based on a wrong assumption is not valid when the assessee preferred for appeal. ...
![Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Assumption-AO-Order-Income-Tax-assessee-appeal-Orissa-High-Court-Assessing-Officer-Taxscan.jpg "Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
![Income Tax: Wrong Claim of Depreciation Does not Attract Penalty, Rules ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Income-Tax-Wrong-Claim-Claim-of-Depreciation-Wrong-Claim-of-Depreciation-Penalty-Rules-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Income Tax: Wrong Claim of Depreciation Does not Attract Penalty, Rules ITAT [Read Order]")
No Satisfaction of Jurisdictional conditions by AO: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed re assessment notice on the ground that no satisfaction of jurisdictional conditions by the Assessing Officer (AO). The petitioner, Standard Industries Limited, is...
![No Satisfaction of Jurisdictional conditions by AO: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Re-Assessment-Notice-Bombay-HC-quashes-Re-Assessment-Notice-Jurisdictional-conditions-AO-Assessing-Officer-Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "No Satisfaction of Jurisdictional conditions by AO: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]")
Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment notice on the ground of failure to satisfy conditions under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and non-application of mind. The Petitioner,...
![Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Non-Application-Bombay-High-Court-Reassessment-notice-Reassessment-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]")
![PoA Holder is Not Owner’ of the Property, No Capital Gain Tax: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PoA-Holder-Owner-Property-Capital-Gain-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "PoA Holder is Not Owner’ of the Property, No Capital Gain Tax: ITAT [Read Order]")