![India-UAE DTAA Prevails: ITAT Allows 100% Deduction for Head Office Expenses, Bypasses Section 44C Restrictions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/India-UAE-DTAA-site-img.jpg "India-UAE DTAA Prevails: ITAT Allows 100% Deduction for Head Office Expenses, Bypasses Section 44C Restrictions [Read Order]")
India-UAE DTAA Prevails: ITAT Allows 100% Deduction for Head Office Expenses, Bypasses Section 44C Restrictions [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that the limitation under Section 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is...
![ITAT Enforces CBDT Threshold: Revenues Rs. 12.82 Lakh Appeal Dismissed under Rs. 60 Lakh Limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CBDT-CBDT-announces-CBDT-announces-e-Dispute-Resolution-Scheme-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Enforces CBDT Threshold: Revenues Rs. 12.82 Lakh Appeal Dismissed under Rs. 60 Lakh Limit [Read Order]")
![Nearly 5-Year Delay in Filing Defective ITRs Due to Financial Hardship: Bombay HC Allows Condonation on Condition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/condonation-delay-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Nearly 5-Year Delay in Filing Defective ITRs Due to Financial Hardship: Bombay HC Allows Condonation on Condition [Read Order]")
![ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs. 24 Lakh Addition, due to Absence of AO’s Justification for Rejecting Assessee’s Explanation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/itat.jpg "ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs. 24 Lakh Addition, due to Absence of AO’s Justification for Rejecting Assessee’s Explanation [Read Order]")
![Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Undue-Benefit-Tax-Payer-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg.webp "Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]")
Trust Charging Fees Alone Does Not Attract Proviso to S. 2(15): ITAT Remands S. 11 Exemption Denial Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]
The Cochin Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded Section 11 matter for fresh adjudication holding that trust charging fees alone does not attract provision to Section 2(15) of the...
![Trust Charging Fees Alone Does Not Attract Proviso to S. 2(15): ITAT Remands S. 11 Exemption Denial Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Exemption-Income-Tax-Return-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg.webp "Trust Charging Fees Alone Does Not Attract Proviso to S. 2(15): ITAT Remands S. 11 Exemption Denial Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh: Delhi HC quashes Reassessment as Beyond 3-Year Time Limit [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court quashed an income tax reassessment, holding that reassessment proceedings could not be sustained beyond the three-year limitation period where the amount...
![Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh: Delhi HC quashes Reassessment as Beyond 3-Year Time Limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-high-court-site-img.jpg "Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh: Delhi HC quashes Reassessment as Beyond 3-Year Time Limit [Read Order]")
Penalty under Income Tax not Imposable for Cash Repayment of Loan on Lender’s Instruction to Curb Interest Escalation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]
The Chhattisgarh High Court has held that the penalty under section 273B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed for cash repayment of a loan on the lender’s instruction to curb interest...
![Penalty under Income Tax not Imposable for Cash Repayment of Loan on Lender’s Instruction to Curb Interest Escalation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Act-Cash-Transaction-Overview-of-Cash-Transaction-tax-evasion-non-cash-payments-reduce-tax-evasion-Cash-Transaction-Provisions-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Income Tax not Imposable for Cash Repayment of Loan on Lender’s Instruction to Curb Interest Escalation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order Allowing 50% Depreciation on CNC Lathe Used Prior to Detection of Defect [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]’s Order Allowing 50% Depreciation on CNC Lathe Used Prior to Detection of...
![ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order Allowing 50% Depreciation on CNC Lathe Used Prior to Detection of Defect [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CNC-Lathe.jpg "ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order Allowing 50% Depreciation on CNC Lathe Used Prior to Detection of Defect [Read Order]")
Minor’s Income Already Clubbed in Mother’s Return Cannot Be Re-opened in Father’s Hands: ITAT Quashes Proceedings [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) quashed the income tax reassessment proceedings initiated against a father after finding that the minor son’s income had already been...
![Minor’s Income Already Clubbed in Mother’s Return Cannot Be Re-opened in Father’s Hands: ITAT Quashes Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Minor-income-tax.jpg "Minor’s Income Already Clubbed in Mother’s Return Cannot Be Re-opened in Father’s Hands: ITAT Quashes Proceedings [Read Order]")
Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]
In a recent decision made by the Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), it was held that the 15% accumulation claim under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be...
![Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rajasthan-cricket-site-img.jpg "Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]")
ITAT Confirms CIT(A)’s Deletion of Rs.1.82 Crore Addition as Revenue Fails to Produce Contrary Evidence [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]’s deletion of Rs. 1.82 crore addition as revenue failed to produce contrary...
![ITAT Confirms CIT(A)’s Deletion of Rs.1.82 Crore Addition as Revenue Fails to Produce Contrary Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Income-tax-Income-tax-news-Tax-news-Corroborative-Evidence-taxscan-1.jpg "ITAT Confirms CIT(A)’s Deletion of Rs.1.82 Crore Addition as Revenue Fails to Produce Contrary Evidence [Read Order]")