![AO Disallows Deemed Application of Income for Non-Filing of Form 10 Electronically: ITAT allows Claims [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078200-income-tax-income-tax-e-filing-e-filing-portal-filing-filing-of-form-10-form-10-taxscan.webp "AO Disallows Deemed Application of Income for Non-Filing of Form 10 Electronically: ITAT allows Claims [Read Order]")
AO Disallows Deemed Application of Income for Non-Filing of Form 10 Electronically: ITAT allows Claims [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹25.50 lakh made for non-electronic filing of Form 10 and directed...
![AO Cannot Go Beyond Net Profit in P&L Except as Permitted under Explanation to Section 115J: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2078071-ao-beyond-net-profit-pl-except-explanation-section-115j-bombay-hc-mahindra-case-taxscan.webp "AO Cannot Go Beyond Net Profit in P&L Except as Permitted under Explanation to Section 115J: Bombay HC in Mahindra Case [Read Order]")
![Search Assessments Valid as Approved by JCIT: ITAT says Additions were made Based on Incriminating Materials [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2078058-search-assessments-valid-approved-by-jcit-itat-incriminating-materials-taxscan.webp "Search Assessments Valid as Approved by JCIT: ITAT says Additions were made Based on Incriminating Materials [Read Order]")
![Factual Correlation of Seized Material Must Be Done by Authorities, Court Cannot Step into AO’s Role: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2077978-seized-material-taxscan.webp "Factual Correlation of Seized Material Must Be Done by Authorities, Court Cannot Step into AO’s Role: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![No TDS on Franchise Payments u/s 194J: ITAT upholds Deletion of ₹59.11 Lakh Income Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/250x150_2077871-franchise-payment-taxscan.webp "No TDS on Franchise Payments u/s 194J: ITAT upholds Deletion of ₹59.11 Lakh Income Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Audit u/s 44AB Not Required and Penalty u/s 271B Not Leviable When No Books of Account Maintained: ITAT [Read Order]
The Rajkot Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that audit under section 44AB is not required and penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act,1961 is not leviable when no books of...
![Audit u/s 44AB Not Required and Penalty u/s 271B Not Leviable When No Books of Account Maintained: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/15/500x300_2076901-penalty-income-tax-act-imposed-for-mistake-by-accountant-itat-taxscan-1.webp "Audit u/s 44AB Not Required and Penalty u/s 271B Not Leviable When No Books of Account Maintained: ITAT [Read Order]")
₹4.24 Crore Received from Brother Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Deletion Citing Documentary and Third-Party Evidence [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) citing documentary and third-party evidence, upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]’s order deleting the ₹4.24 crore addition...
![₹4.24 Crore Received from Brother Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Deletion Citing Documentary and Third-Party Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/15/500x300_2076926-unexplained-cash-credit-itat-cita-taxscan.webp "₹4.24 Crore Received from Brother Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Deletion Citing Documentary and Third-Party Evidence [Read Order]")
AO Obtains Invalid Sanction for Reopening Assessment Beyond Three Years u/s 148: ITAT Quashes Notice and Proceedings [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT ) quashed the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act,1961 and reassessment proceedings, as the Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the...
![AO Obtains Invalid Sanction for Reopening Assessment Beyond Three Years u/s 148: ITAT Quashes Notice and Proceedings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/15/500x300_2076905-reopening-assessment-taxscan.webp "AO Obtains Invalid Sanction for Reopening Assessment Beyond Three Years u/s 148: ITAT Quashes Notice and Proceedings [Read Order]")
ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeals in Absence of Incriminating Material in Unabated Assessments, Upholds Deletion of S.68 Additions of ₹ 2.71 Cr [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the Revenue’s appeals for three assessment years and held that in the absence of any incriminating material found during...
![ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeals in Absence of Incriminating Material in Unabated Assessments, Upholds Deletion of S.68 Additions of ₹ 2.71 Cr [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/15/500x300_2076875-itat-directs-ao-itat-taxscan-3.webp "ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeals in Absence of Incriminating Material in Unabated Assessments, Upholds Deletion of S.68 Additions of ₹ 2.71 Cr [Read Order]")
Assessments u/s 153C Quashed: ITAT Rules Notices for AY 2008-09 to 2012-13 Invalid Due to Limitation and Lack of Valid Satisfaction [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has invalidated assessment proceedings initiated under Section153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years (AY) 2008-09 to...
![Assessments u/s 153C Quashed: ITAT Rules Notices for AY 2008-09 to 2012-13 Invalid Due to Limitation and Lack of Valid Satisfaction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/13/500x300_2076390-2044201-mechanical-itat-assessment-application-of-mind-taxscan.webp "Assessments u/s 153C Quashed: ITAT Rules Notices for AY 2008-09 to 2012-13 Invalid Due to Limitation and Lack of Valid Satisfaction [Read Order]")
Erroneous Double Addition of ₹13.32 Lakh in Income Computation: ITAT Directs AO to Correct and Recompute Taxable Income [Read Order]
The Rajkot Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to correct the erroneous double addition of ₹13.32 lakh in the assessee’s income computation and ...
![Erroneous Double Addition of ₹13.32 Lakh in Income Computation: ITAT Directs AO to Correct and Recompute Taxable Income [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/13/500x300_2076398-tat-itat-rajkot-income-computation-error-cita-ao-taxscan.webp "Erroneous Double Addition of ₹13.32 Lakh in Income Computation: ITAT Directs AO to Correct and Recompute Taxable Income [Read Order]")
ITAT Allows Use of Extrapolated Data for Comparables With Different Year-End in ITeS Transfer Pricing Dispute Involving Goldman Sachs [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the use of extrapolated data for comparables with a different financial year-end in an ITeS transfer pricing dispute involving ...
![ITAT Allows Use of Extrapolated Data for Comparables With Different Year-End in ITeS Transfer Pricing Dispute Involving Goldman Sachs [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/13/500x300_2076448-itat-mumbai-goldman-sachs-itat-case.webp "ITAT Allows Use of Extrapolated Data for Comparables With Different Year-End in ITeS Transfer Pricing Dispute Involving Goldman Sachs [Read Order]")