Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Extrapolation Not Permitted in Income Tax Search Assessment Proceedings: ITAT rules Order Unsubstantiated, allows Appeal [Read Order] Extrapolation Not Permitted in Income Tax Search Assessment Proceedings: ITAT rules Order Unsubstantiated, allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/11/2124607-itat-chandigarh-extrapolation-income-tax-assessment-proceedings-itat-search-assessment-extrapolation-in-income-tax-itat-allows-appeal-taxscan.webp)
Extrapolation Not Permitted in Income Tax Search Assessment Proceedings: ITAT rules Order Unsubstantiated, allows Appeal [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Chandigarh Bench, has recently held an order which had extrapolated reasonings unsubstantiated. The...



![Income Tax Addition Solely Based on Pendrive Data Seized from Third Party not Sustainable: ITAT Quashes Order [Read Order] Income Tax Addition Solely Based on Pendrive Data Seized from Third Party not Sustainable: ITAT Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/09/2124356-income-tax-addition-solely-based-pendrive-data-seized-third-party-sustainable-itat-quashes-order-taxscan.webp)
![ITAT Upholds Revision Order Against Ambuja Cements, Flags Unverified INSIGHT Portal Inputs on Alleged Accommodation Entries [Read Order] ITAT Upholds Revision Order Against Ambuja Cements, Flags Unverified INSIGHT Portal Inputs on Alleged Accommodation Entries [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/07/2124107-itat-upholds-revision-order-against-ambuja-cements.webp)
![Taxpayer Cannot Demand Entire Material at S. 148A(b) Stage, “Information” Means Concise Details: Delhi HC [Read Order] Taxpayer Cannot Demand Entire Material at S. 148A(b) Stage, “Information” Means Concise Details: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/06/2124057-taxpayer-cannot-demand-entire-material.webp)
![Selective Comparison of Expense Heads across AYs Cannot Justify Disallowance without Evidence: ITAT [Read Order] Selective Comparison of Expense Heads across AYs Cannot Justify Disallowance without Evidence: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/06/2124005-disallowance-without-evidence-itat-taxscan.webp)

![CIT(A)’s Order is Unjust and Unfair: ITAT Restores ₹14.25 Cr Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) After Rejecting DCF Valuation [Read Order] CIT(A)’s Order is Unjust and Unfair: ITAT Restores ₹14.25 Cr Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) After Rejecting DCF Valuation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/05/2123921-itat-restores-taxscan.webp)

![ITAT Condones 63 Day-Delayed Appeal due to Hospitalization, Remands ₹67L Income Tax Deduction Claim u/s 80IB [Read Order] ITAT Condones 63 Day-Delayed Appeal due to Hospitalization, Remands ₹67L Income Tax Deduction Claim u/s 80IB [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/05/2123879-itat-condones-63-day-delayed-appeal-due-to-hospitalization.webp)

![Budget 2026 Clarifies S.92CA: 60 Days Time Limit for TP Orders Codified [Read Finance Bill 2026] Budget 2026 Clarifies S.92CA: 60 Days Time Limit for TP Orders Codified [Read Finance Bill 2026]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/01/2123097-budget-2026-clarifies-time-limit-tp-orders-codified-taxscan.webp)