![Failure to Comply 2 Year Old Guidelines for Cancelling GST Registration: Gujarat HC criticizes GST Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Gujarat-High-Court-Gujarat-HC-GST-GST-Registration-GST-Registration-Cancellation-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Comply 2 Year Old Guidelines for Cancelling GST Registration: Gujarat HC criticizes GST Authority [Read Order]")
Failure to Comply 2 Year Old Guidelines for Cancelling GST Registration: Gujarat HC criticizes GST Authority [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Gujarat High Court criticized the GST authorities over their failure to comply with two years old guidelines issued in...
![Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Law-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Failure of CA to appear before AO Results in Ex-Parte Income Tax Assessment: Karnataka High Court quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Karnataka-High-Court-Income-Tax-Assessment-Income-Tax-Chartered-Accountant-Ex-parte-income-tax-assessment-taxscan.jpg "Failure of CA to appear before AO Results in Ex-Parte Income Tax Assessment: Karnataka High Court quashes Order [Read Order]")
![Rs. 17.48Cr adjusted erroneously towards Income Tax Demand: Karnataka HC directs for Refund with Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Icome-Tax-Income-Tax-Demand-Karnataka-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rs. 17.48Cr adjusted erroneously towards Income Tax Demand: Karnataka HC directs for Refund with Interest [Read Order]")
![Single Satisfaction Note Sufficient u/s 153C When Same Assessing Officer Handles Both Searched Person and Other Party: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Madras-High-Court-Single-Satisfaction-Note-TAXSCAN.jpg "Single Satisfaction Note Sufficient u/s 153C When Same Assessing Officer Handles Both Searched Person and Other Party: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Guidance Value of Land or Building Should be used to Determine Consideration Where Transfer Value of Capital Asset is not determinable: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT)ruled that the guidance value of land or building should be used to determine the consideration when the transfer value of a capital asset is...
![Guidance Value of Land or Building Should be used to Determine Consideration Where Transfer Value of Capital Asset is not determinable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/site-imd-28.jpg "Guidance Value of Land or Building Should be used to Determine Consideration Where Transfer Value of Capital Asset is not determinable: ITAT [Read Order]")
Insufficiency of Verification efforts by AO, CIT(A): ITAT deletes Addition w.r.t. Sundry Creditors [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the additions of Rs. 90,79,428 and Rs. 29,60,999 related to sundry creditors due to insufficient verification efforts by the...
![Insufficiency of Verification efforts by AO, CIT(A): ITAT deletes Addition w.r.t. Sundry Creditors [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Section-68-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan-3.jpg "Insufficiency of Verification efforts by AO, CIT(A): ITAT deletes Addition w.r.t. Sundry Creditors [Read Order]")
Distribution Revenue from US Broadcasting Company not Taxable as “Royalty” under India-US DTAA [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Delhi Bench has ruled that the distribution revenue received by Turner Broadcasting System Asia Pacific, Inc. ( TBSAP ), a...
![Distribution Revenue from US Broadcasting Company not Taxable as “Royalty” under India-US DTAA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-India-US-DTAA-US-broadcasting-company-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Distribution Revenue from US Broadcasting Company not Taxable as “Royalty” under India-US DTAA [Read Order]")
Non-Appearance before CIT(A) Due to Hearing Notices Sent to Non-Communication Email Address: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal( ITAT ) found that the non-appearance of assessee before the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)] was due to hearing notices being sent to...
![Non-Appearance before CIT(A) Due to Hearing Notices Sent to Non-Communication Email Address: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Email-address-issues-under-ITAT-Hearing-Notices-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Appearance before CIT(A) Due to Hearing Notices Sent to Non-Communication Email Address: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Minimum 7-Day Must Be Given to Respond to Notice issued u/s 148A(b) of Income Tax: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court has ruled that a minimum seven-day response period shall be granted mandatorily for the notices issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ...
![Minimum 7-Day Must Be Given to Respond to Notice issued u/s 148A(b) of Income Tax: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Notice-Section-148-TAXSCAN.jpg "Minimum 7-Day Must Be Given to Respond to Notice issued u/s 148A(b) of Income Tax: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
CIT(A) cannot dismiss Income Tax Appeal on Limitation Grounds after Condoning Delay: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal( ITAT ) ruled that the CIT(A) cannot dismiss an income tax appeal on limitation grounds after condoning the delay. Kyalasanahalli Narayanappa...
![CIT(A) cannot dismiss Income Tax Appeal on Limitation Grounds after Condoning Delay: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-Condone-delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "CIT(A) cannot dismiss Income Tax Appeal on Limitation Grounds after Condoning Delay: ITAT [Read Order]")