![Delay in Filing Appeal Before CIT(A) due to ignorance of Legal Procedures and Non-Follow-Up: ITAT Condones Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Ahmedabad-CITA-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Appeals-Filing-Appeal-TAXSCAN.webp "Delay in Filing Appeal Before CIT(A) due to ignorance of Legal Procedures and Non-Follow-Up: ITAT Condones Delay [Read Order]")
Delay in Filing Appeal Before CIT(A) due to ignorance of Legal Procedures and Non-Follow-Up: ITAT Condones Delay [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) condones the delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax...
![Non-Compliance and Failure to Explain Bank Credits: ITAT upholds ₹3.13 Crore S.69 Addition under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Income-Tax-ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-Cash-deposits-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Compliance and Failure to Explain Bank Credits: ITAT upholds ₹3.13 Crore S.69 Addition under Income Tax [Read Order]")
![Revenue not Justified in Addition made based on Rough Noting on Loose Sheets: ITAT quashes S.40 Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Quashes-Income-Tax-Section-40A3-the-Income-Tax-Act-Loose-Sheets-taxscan.jpg "Revenue not Justified in Addition made based on Rough Noting on Loose Sheets: ITAT quashes S.40 Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes ₹9.84 Lakh Addition u/s 69A after Verifying Cash Deposits Linked to ₹10 Lakh Earlier Withdrawal, not Additional Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-cash-deposits-Section-69A-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT deletes ₹9.84 Lakh Addition u/s 69A after Verifying Cash Deposits Linked to ₹10 Lakh Earlier Withdrawal, not Additional Income [Read Order]")
![Patna HC sets aside GST Demand Order Lacking Date making Appeal Limitation Indeterminable [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Patna-High-Court-GST-Demand-Order-GST-Demand-GST-Taxscan.jpg "Patna HC sets aside GST Demand Order Lacking Date making Appeal Limitation Indeterminable [Read Order]")
Co-operative Societies offering Credit Facilities can claim Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
In the recent ruling, the Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that co-operative societies offering credit facilities to their members can claim deductions under section...
![Co-operative Societies offering Credit Facilities can claim Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Co-operative-societies-credit-facilities-Income-Tax-Deduction-Deduction-under-Section-80P-Tax-benefits-for-co-operative-societies-Section-80P-income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Co-operative Societies offering Credit Facilities can claim Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Deduction Benefits u/s 80-I Claimable upon Conversion of Proprietorship Concern to Pvt. Limited Company: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]
In a recent case before High Court of Punjab and Haryana the deductions claimed under section 80-I of the Income Tax Act were allowed upon the conversion of Proprietorship Concern to Private Limited...
Failure to Refer Valuation of Land to DVO after Satisfying Conditions of S. 50C(2) of Income Tax Act: ITAT directs De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) erred by not referring the land valuation to the Departmental Valuation Officer ( DVO ) under...
![Failure to Refer Valuation of Land to DVO after Satisfying Conditions of S. 50C(2) of Income Tax Act: ITAT directs De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-Mumbai-ITAT-ruling-on-land-valuation-de-novo-process-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Refer Valuation of Land to DVO after Satisfying Conditions of S. 50C(2) of Income Tax Act: ITAT directs De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]")
Failure to Comply 2 Year Old Guidelines for Cancelling GST Registration: Gujarat HC criticizes GST Authority [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Gujarat High Court criticized the GST authorities over their failure to comply with two years old guidelines issued in Aggrawal Dyeing & Printing vs. State of Gujarat...
![Failure to Comply 2 Year Old Guidelines for Cancelling GST Registration: Gujarat HC criticizes GST Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Gujarat-High-Court-Gujarat-HC-GST-GST-Registration-GST-Registration-Cancellation-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Comply 2 Year Old Guidelines for Cancelling GST Registration: Gujarat HC criticizes GST Authority [Read Order]")
Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that the amendment to Section 14A of the Income tax Act, 1961 which aimed to clarify the law, cannot be applied retrospectively if it...
![Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Law-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]")
Failure of CA to appear before AO Results in Ex-Parte Income Tax Assessment: Karnataka High Court quashes Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court quashed income tax assessment order, ruling that the petitioner had entrusted the case to a Chartered Accountant, who was unable to appear before the...
![Failure of CA to appear before AO Results in Ex-Parte Income Tax Assessment: Karnataka High Court quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Karnataka-High-Court-Income-Tax-Assessment-Income-Tax-Chartered-Accountant-Ex-parte-income-tax-assessment-taxscan.jpg "Failure of CA to appear before AO Results in Ex-Parte Income Tax Assessment: Karnataka High Court quashes Order [Read Order]")
Rs. 17.48Cr adjusted erroneously towards Income Tax Demand: Karnataka HC directs for Refund with Interest [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has directed the refund of Rs. 17.48 crore, which was erroneously adjusted towards an Income Tax demand, along with interest. The petitioner, LSI...
![Rs. 17.48Cr adjusted erroneously towards Income Tax Demand: Karnataka HC directs for Refund with Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Icome-Tax-Income-Tax-Demand-Karnataka-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rs. 17.48Cr adjusted erroneously towards Income Tax Demand: Karnataka HC directs for Refund with Interest [Read Order]")