![ITAT Quashes Reassessment as AO Fails to Address Objections in Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-Reassessment-as-AO-Address-Objections-Proceedings-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Quashes Reassessment as AO Fails to Address Objections in Proceedings [Read Order]")
ITAT Quashes Reassessment as AO Fails to Address Objections in Proceedings [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) quashed the reassessment proceedings because the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to...
![Minimal Opportunity of Hearing is Must for GST Assessment Order Creating Heavy civil liability: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Allahabad-High-Court-Minimal-Opportunity-GST-Assessment-Order-Taxscan.jpg "Minimal Opportunity of Hearing is Must for GST Assessment Order Creating Heavy civil liability: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Refund Claims Not Maintainable Without Challenging Assessment Order or Classification: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-Refund-Claims-Assessment-Orde-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Refund Claims Not Maintainable Without Challenging Assessment Order or Classification: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Revision Proceedings u/s 263 Not Maintainable After Assessment Order Declared Non Est: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ),ruled that revision proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act,1961 are not maintainable after an assessment order is declared non...
![Revision Proceedings u/s 263 Not Maintainable After Assessment Order Declared Non Est: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Assessment-Order-Revision-Proceedings-Taxscan.jpg "Revision Proceedings u/s 263 Not Maintainable After Assessment Order Declared Non Est: ITAT [Read Order]")
Disallowance of Expense u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act is Valid in absence to Contrary Evidence to Purchase of Paddy from Unregistered Farmers: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court has held that disallowance of expense under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is valid in the absence of contrary evidence to the purchase of paddy from unregistered...
![Disallowance of Expense u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act is Valid in absence to Contrary Evidence to Purchase of Paddy from Unregistered Farmers: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Kerala-High-Court-Disallowance-Disallowance-of-Expense-Paddy-Taxscan.jpg "Disallowance of Expense u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act is Valid in absence to Contrary Evidence to Purchase of Paddy from Unregistered Farmers: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
No Additions can be made in unabated Years without Incriminating Material u/s 153C: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the decision of the commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)], stating that no additions can be made in unabated years under section...
![No Additions can be made in unabated Years without Incriminating Material u/s 153C: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Delhi-Section-153C-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Additions can be made in unabated Years without Incriminating Material u/s 153C: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Rs. 1.6 Crore Unexplained Credit Addition: ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-tax-unexplained-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rs. 1.6 Crore Unexplained Credit Addition: ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
ITC claimed after Deadline Prescribed u/s 16(4): Madras HC Orders Reassessment of ITC Claims Considering s. 16(5) [Read Order]
The Madras High Court sets aside GST ITC disallowance under Section 16( 4 ) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for belated filings, owing to S.16( 5 ) insertion. In this case, the writ...
![ITC claimed after Deadline Prescribed u/s 16(4): Madras HC Orders Reassessment of ITC Claims Considering s. 16(5) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITC-ITC-claimed-after-Deadline-Madras-HC-Reassessment-Madras-HC-Orders-Reassessment-Reassessment-of-ITC-Reassessment-of-ITC-Claims-Considerings-GST-Madras-High-Court-GST-ITC-disallowance-Taxscan.jpg "ITC claimed after Deadline Prescribed u/s 16(4): Madras HC Orders Reassessment of ITC Claims Considering s. 16(5) [Read Order]")
ITAT Remands Back Appeal to CIT(A) u/s 249(3), Citing Delay in Filing Appeal Not a Valid Ground for Dismissal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that the CIT(A) cannot dismiss an income tax appeal on limitation grounds after condoning the delay. Rambadal Dhunmum Yadav, the...
![ITAT Remands Back Appeal to CIT(A) u/s 249(3), Citing Delay in Filing Appeal Not a Valid Ground for Dismissal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "ITAT Remands Back Appeal to CIT(A) u/s 249(3), Citing Delay in Filing Appeal Not a Valid Ground for Dismissal [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Rs. 19.6 Lakh Addition for AY 2018-19, applying Retrospective 10% Safe Harbour Limit based on Curative Amendment [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the ₹19.6 lakh addition made for AY 2018-19 under Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Income Tax Act,1961 applying the retrospective 10%...
![ITAT deletes Rs. 19.6 Lakh Addition for AY 2018-19, applying Retrospective 10% Safe Harbour Limit based on Curative Amendment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-AY-2018-Retrospective-Safe-Harbour-Curative-Amendment-taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Rs. 19.6 Lakh Addition for AY 2018-19, applying Retrospective 10% Safe Harbour Limit based on Curative Amendment [Read Order]")