![KYC Form is Prima Facie proof for Address of Account Holder: ITAT upholds Addition on Account of Unexplained Cash Deposits [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/KYC-Form-Prima-Facie-proof-Address-Account-Holder-ITAT-Account-Unexplained-Cash-Deposits-Taxscan.jpeg "KYC Form is Prima Facie proof for Address of Account Holder: ITAT upholds Addition on Account of Unexplained Cash Deposits [Read Order]")
KYC Form is Prima Facie proof for Address of Account Holder: ITAT upholds Addition on Account of Unexplained Cash Deposits [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that Know Your Customer (KYC) Form is prima facie proof for address of account...
![Writ Jurisdiction can be invoked in Exceptional Circumstances: Calcutta HC refuses to Quash Assessment Order under WB Agricultural Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Writ-Jurisdiction-Exceptional-Circumstances-Calcutta-HC-Assessment-Order-WB-Agricultural-Income-Tax-Act-Taxscan.jpeg "Writ Jurisdiction can be invoked in Exceptional Circumstances: Calcutta HC refuses to Quash Assessment Order under WB Agricultural Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Appeals cannot be dismissed merely because Assessee opted VSVS and Form 5 is Issued: ITAT directs NFAC to decide Appeals on Merits [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/National-Faceless-Assessment-Centre-Appeals-Assessee-VSVS-ITAT-NFAC-Taxscan.jpeg "Appeals cannot be dismissed merely because Assessee opted VSVS and Form 5 is Issued: ITAT directs NFAC to decide Appeals on Merits [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Stay Order not Communicated: Bombay HC asks Assessee to pay Cost of Rs. 25,000 to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Income-Tax-Bombay-High-Court-Assessee-AO-stay-order-Taxscan.jpeg "Income Tax Stay Order not Communicated: Bombay HC asks Assessee to pay Cost of Rs. 25,000 to AO [Read Order]")
![Closure of Business is a Reasonable Cause for Non-cooperation with Income Tax proceedings: ITAT quashes Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Closure-of-Business-Reasonable-Cause-Non-cooperation-Income-Tax-proceedings-ITAT-Ex-Parte-Order-Taxscan.jpeg "Closure of Business is a Reasonable Cause for Non-cooperation with Income Tax proceedings: ITAT quashes Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]")
New Proposals during Remand Proceedings inter-connected with the First Notice cannot be Quashed: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that the assessee has to answer the proposals contained in the show cause notice dated 20.12.2019, the content of which has been incorporated in the impugned show...
![New Proposals during Remand Proceedings inter-connected with the First Notice cannot be Quashed: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Notice-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpeg "New Proposals during Remand Proceedings inter-connected with the First Notice cannot be Quashed: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Power to grant Stay under Telangana VAT Act is Discretionary, Shall be Exercised in a Fair and Judicious Manner balancing Interest of both Sides: Telangana HC [Read Order]
A division bench of the Telangana High Court has held that the power of the authorities under the Telangana VAT Act, 2005 is discretionary and the same shall be exercised in a fair and judicious...
![Power to grant Stay under Telangana VAT Act is Discretionary, Shall be Exercised in a Fair and Judicious Manner balancing Interest of both Sides: Telangana HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Telangana-VAT-Act-Interest-Telangana-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Power to grant Stay under Telangana VAT Act is Discretionary, Shall be Exercised in a Fair and Judicious Manner balancing Interest of both Sides: Telangana HC [Read Order]")
![Penalty cannot be levied based on Estimate Addition: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Penalty-Estimate-Addition-levied-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty cannot be levied based on Estimate Addition: ITAT [Read Order]")
Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]
The Supreme Court, in view of repeal of section 144B(9) of the Finance Act, 2022, has stayed an assessment order declared as non-est by the High Court. The petitioner, National Faceless Assessment...
![Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Repeal-Finance-Act-Supreme-Court-High-Court-Order-Assessment-Order-Non-Est-Taxscan.jpeg "Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]")
Revision Order merely because of Non-mentioning of specific reasons for accepting the explanation of the assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be invoked merely because the Assessing Officer has...
![Revision Order merely because of Non-mentioning of specific reasons for accepting the explanation of the assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Revision-Order-specific-reasons-explanation-assesse-Invalid-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Revision Order merely because of Non-mentioning of specific reasons for accepting the explanation of the assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessee couldn’t Realize the Effect of Assessment Order: ITAT condones Delay of 41 Months, says 'There is No Supposition That Everybody is the Custodian of Law' [Read Order]
The ITAT, Mumbai bench has condoned a delay of 41 months and held that the fact that the assessee could not realize the effect of assessment order issued by the CPC can be a valid ground for...
![Assessee couldn’t Realize the Effect of Assessment Order: ITAT condones Delay of 41 Months, says There is No Supposition That Everybody is the Custodian of Law [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Assessee-Assessment-Order-ITAT-Delay-of-41-Months-Custodian-of-Law-Taxscan.jpg "Assessee couldn’t Realize the Effect of Assessment Order: ITAT condones Delay of 41 Months, says There is No Supposition That Everybody is the Custodian of Law [Read Order]")
Assessing Officer Failed to Record the Reason for issue of Notice u/s 148: Chhattisgarh HC quashes Notice [Read Order]
The High Court of Chhattisgarh has held that Assessing Officer failed to record the reason for issue of notice u/s 148 and quashes notice. The petitioner, Hariom Ingots and Power Pvt. Ltd. is a...
![Assessing Officer Failed to Record the Reason for issue of Notice u/s 148: Chhattisgarh HC quashes Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Assessing-Officer-Record-Reason-notice-u-s-148-quashes-notice-Chhattisgarh-high-court-Taxscan.jpeg "Assessing Officer Failed to Record the Reason for issue of Notice u/s 148: Chhattisgarh HC quashes Notice [Read Order]")