![Delhi HC stays Assessment Order passed under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act as revenue failed to furnish evidence Linking Assessee and Other person [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Delhi-HC-assessment-order-Section-153C-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-linking-assessee-Taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC stays Assessment Order passed under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act as revenue failed to furnish evidence Linking Assessee and Other person [Read Order]")
Delhi HC stays Assessment Order passed under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act as revenue failed to furnish evidence Linking Assessee and Other person [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court stayed the assessment order passed under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act as revenue failed to furnish evidence linking the...
![PCIT cant assume Jurisdiction u/s 263 when AO has made Sufficient Enquiry: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Assessment.jpg "PCIT cant assume Jurisdiction u/s 263 when AO has made Sufficient Enquiry: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Assessment without issuance of Notice U/s 143(2) is void ab-initio: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Assessment2.jpg "Assessment without issuance of Notice U/s 143(2) is void ab-initio: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
![Non-Consideration of Evidence during Assessment: Telangana imposes Cost on AO, asks to initiate Disciplinary Action [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Telangana-HC-cost-of-litigation-AO-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Consideration of Evidence during Assessment: Telangana imposes Cost on AO, asks to initiate Disciplinary Action [Read Order]")
![Notice issued u/s 143(2) to be served upon the assessee within six months: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/assessee-notice-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Notice issued u/s 143(2) to be served upon the assessee within six months: ITAT [Read Order]")
AO wrongfully assumed the jurisdiction and passed the final assessment order without passing a draft assessment order: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) wrongfully assumed the jurisdiction and passed the final assessment order without passing a draft assessment order. The...
![AO wrongfully assumed the jurisdiction and passed the final assessment order without passing a draft assessment order: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/AO-jurisdiction-final-assessment-order-assessment-order-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "AO wrongfully assumed the jurisdiction and passed the final assessment order without passing a draft assessment order: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]")
![GST: Karnataka Govt. issues Salient features of e-Shodane under KGST Act, 2017 [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Karnataka-Government-Salient-features-e-Shodane-KGST-Act-Taxscan.jpeg "GST: Karnataka Govt. issues Salient features of e-Shodane under KGST Act, 2017 [Read Circular]")
![Order cannot be termed as “erroneous” unless it is not in accordance with Law: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Order-erroneous-law-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Order cannot be termed as “erroneous” unless it is not in accordance with Law: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mixed questions of facts and law ought to be filed before the first Appellate Authority and thereafter before Tribunal in Second Appeal: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras high court while dismissing the appeal held that the mixed questions of facts and law ought to be filed before the first Appellate Authority and thereafter before Tribunal in Second...
![Mixed questions of facts and law ought to be filed before the first Appellate Authority and thereafter before Tribunal in Second Appeal: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Mixed-questions-of-facts-law-Appellate-Authority-Second-Appeal-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Mixed questions of facts and law ought to be filed before the first Appellate Authority and thereafter before Tribunal in Second Appeal: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Transfer Order is administrative order and not quasi-judicial order, Assessee don’t have any right to choose Assessing Authority: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court held that the Transfer Order is an administrative order and not a quasi-judicial order. The assessee does not have any right to choose Assessing Authority. The Appellant...
![Transfer Order is administrative order and not quasi-judicial order, Assessee don’t have any right to choose Assessing Authority: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Transfer-Order-administrative-order-quasi-judicial-order-Assessing-Authority-Madras-High-court-Taxscan-1.jpg "Transfer Order is administrative order and not quasi-judicial order, Assessee don’t have any right to choose Assessing Authority: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Andhra Pradesh High Court quashes order levying GST on Value of broken Rice, Bran, and Husk [Read Judgment]
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed the Assessment Order for levying GST on the value of broken rice, bran and husk obtained by the petitioner on milling of the paddy. The petitioner is a...
![Andhra Pradesh High Court quashes order levying GST on Value of broken Rice, Bran, and Husk [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court-levying-GST-broken-rice-bran-husk.jpeg "Andhra Pradesh High Court quashes order levying GST on Value of broken Rice, Bran, and Husk [Read Judgment]")