![Income Tax Authorities Fail to Consider Submission on Lenders Identity and Creditworthiness: Karnataka HC Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Authorities-Karnataka-High-Court-Tax-Authorities-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Authorities Fail to Consider Submission on Lenders Identity and Creditworthiness: Karnataka HC Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
Income Tax Authorities Fail to Consider Submission on Lenders Identity and Creditworthiness: Karnataka HC Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration due to income tax authorities' failure to consider the...
![Entry Made In Dispatch Register Does Not prove Service of Notice under Income Tax Act: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-1961-TAXSCAN.jpg "Entry Made In Dispatch Register Does Not prove Service of Notice under Income Tax Act: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
![ITAT remands Case to CIT(A) for Fresh Review, Citing Procedural Deficiencies in Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Chennai-Commisioner-of-Income-Tax-Assessment-Order-Assessment-Order-Issues-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT remands Case to CIT(A) for Fresh Review, Citing Procedural Deficiencies in Assessment Order [Read Order]")
![Curable Defect in Form 35A: ITAT Sets Aside DRP Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Curable Defect in Form 35A: ITAT Sets Aside DRP Order [Read Order]")
“Fair Tax Regime where No Assessee is Harassed is Equally Crucial”: Bombay HC imposes ₹ 20k Cost on Maharashtra VAT Dept for Natural Justice Violations [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court, stressed the importance of a fair and transparent tax regime while imposing a cost of ₹20,000 on the Maharashtra VAT Department for violating the principles of natural justice....
![“Fair Tax Regime where No Assessee is Harassed is Equally Crucial”: Bombay HC imposes ₹ 20k Cost on Maharashtra VAT Dept for Natural Justice Violations [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/VAT-VAT-Department-Bombay-High-Court-Maharashtra-VAT-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "“Fair Tax Regime where No Assessee is Harassed is Equally Crucial”: Bombay HC imposes ₹ 20k Cost on Maharashtra VAT Dept for Natural Justice Violations [Read Order]")
GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court quashed the Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) assessment order after the Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) department agreed that they indeed passed the order...
![GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-GST-Act-GST-Act-2017-GST-assessment-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Challenge against Income Tax Order directing Re ajudication by AO: Orissa HC dismissed Petition in Absence of Substantial Question Of Law [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court in a recent case dismissed the petition in absence of substantial question of law. The Writ petition was on challenging the Income Tax Order which directs ...
![Challenge against Income Tax Order directing Re ajudication by AO: Orissa HC dismissed Petition in Absence of Substantial Question Of Law [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Orissa-High-Court-Income-Tax-Order-Reajudication-Taxscan.jpg "Challenge against Income Tax Order directing Re ajudication by AO: Orissa HC dismissed Petition in Absence of Substantial Question Of Law [Read Order]")
AO Cannot Refer File to JC Regarding Penalty u/s 271D of Income Tax without Recording “Satisfaction”: Andhra Pradesh HC
The Andhra Pradesh High Court in its recent ruling has held that an Assessing Officer ( AO ) cannot refer an assessee's file to the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax for levying penalty under Section...
GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has directed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) department to re-do the assessment considering the amendments in Finance Act ( No. 2 ), 2024 in a matter of rejection of Input...
![GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-ITC-Rejected-Input-Tax-Credit-Finance-Act-GST-department-taxscan.jpg "GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]")
Order must be Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue Interests for Invoking S.263 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that for invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act,1961 an order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the...
![Order must be Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue Interests for Invoking S.263 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-tax-Income-Tax-Act-Revenue-Interests-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpeg "Order must be Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue Interests for Invoking S.263 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")